TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized sham-controlled trial evaluating efficacy and safety of endoscopic gastric plication for primary obesity
T2 - The ESSENTIAL trial
AU - Sullivan, Shelby
AU - Swain, James M.
AU - Woodman, George
AU - Antonetti, Marc
AU - De La Cruz-Muñoz, Nestor
AU - Jonnalagadda, Sreeni S.
AU - Ujiki, Michael
AU - Ikramuddin, Sayeed
AU - Ponce, Jaime
AU - Ryou, Marvin
AU - Reynoso, Jason
AU - Chhabra, Rajiv
AU - Sorenson, G. Brent
AU - Clarkston, Wendell K.
AU - Edmundowicz, Steven A.
AU - Eagon, J. Christopher
AU - Mullady, Daniel K.
AU - Leslie, Daniel
AU - Lavin, Thomas E.
AU - Thompson, Christopher C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Obesity Society
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - Objective: Evaluate safety and efficacy of the pose™ procedure for obesity treatment. Methods: Subjects with Class I to II obesity were randomized (2:1) to receive active or sham procedure, after each investigator performed unblinded lead-in cases. All subjects were provided low-intensity lifestyle therapy. Efficacy end points were the mean difference in percent total body weight loss (%TBWL) at 12 months between randomized groups, and responder rate achieving ≥5% TBWL. The primary safety end point was incidence of reported adverse events. Results: Three hundred thirty-two subjects were randomized (active, n = 221; sham, n = 111); thirty-four subjects were included in the unblinded lead-in cohort. Twelve-month results were mean TBWL 7.0 ± 7.4% in lead-in, 4.95 ± 7.04% in active, and 1.38 ± 5.58% in sham groups, respectively. Responder rate was 41.55% in active and 22.11% in sham groups, respectively (P < 0.0001); mean responder result was 11.5% TBWL. The differences observed between active and sham groups for co-primary end points were statistically significant (P < 0.0001); however, super superiority margin as set forth in the study design was not met. No unanticipated adverse events or deaths occurred. Procedure-related serious adverse event rates were 5.0% (active) and 0.9% (sham), P = 0.068. Conclusions: The pose procedure was safe and resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful weight loss over sham through 1 year.
AB - Objective: Evaluate safety and efficacy of the pose™ procedure for obesity treatment. Methods: Subjects with Class I to II obesity were randomized (2:1) to receive active or sham procedure, after each investigator performed unblinded lead-in cases. All subjects were provided low-intensity lifestyle therapy. Efficacy end points were the mean difference in percent total body weight loss (%TBWL) at 12 months between randomized groups, and responder rate achieving ≥5% TBWL. The primary safety end point was incidence of reported adverse events. Results: Three hundred thirty-two subjects were randomized (active, n = 221; sham, n = 111); thirty-four subjects were included in the unblinded lead-in cohort. Twelve-month results were mean TBWL 7.0 ± 7.4% in lead-in, 4.95 ± 7.04% in active, and 1.38 ± 5.58% in sham groups, respectively. Responder rate was 41.55% in active and 22.11% in sham groups, respectively (P < 0.0001); mean responder result was 11.5% TBWL. The differences observed between active and sham groups for co-primary end points were statistically significant (P < 0.0001); however, super superiority margin as set forth in the study design was not met. No unanticipated adverse events or deaths occurred. Procedure-related serious adverse event rates were 5.0% (active) and 0.9% (sham), P = 0.068. Conclusions: The pose procedure was safe and resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful weight loss over sham through 1 year.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010461188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/oby.21702
DO - 10.1002/oby.21702
M3 - Article
C2 - 28000425
AN - SCOPUS:85010461188
SN - 1930-7381
VL - 25
SP - 294
EP - 301
JO - Obesity
JF - Obesity
IS - 2
ER -