TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin With Bevacizumab or Placebo in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
T2 - Results of CALGB 90601 (Alliance)
AU - Rosenberg, Jonathan E.
AU - Ballman, Karla A.
AU - Halabi, Susan
AU - Atherton, Pamela J.
AU - Mortazavi, Amir
AU - Sweeney, Christopher
AU - Stadler, Walter M.
AU - Teply, Benjamin A.
AU - Picus, Joel
AU - Tagawa, Scott T.
AU - Katragadda, Sreedhar
AU - Vaena, Daniel
AU - Misleh, Jamal
AU - Hoimes, Christopher
AU - Plimack, Elizabeth R.
AU - Flaig, Thomas W.
AU - Dreicer, Robert
AU - Bajorin, Dean
AU - Hahn, Olwen
AU - Small, Eric J.
AU - Morris, Michael J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers U10CA180821 and U10CA180882 to the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, UG1CA233180 to Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, UG1CA233290 and P30CA008748 to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, UG1CA233234 to Case Western Reserve University, UG1CA233324 to University of Colorado-Denver, UG1CA233327 to University of Chicago, UG1CA233331 to The Ohio State University, UG1CA233339 to Washington University, UG1CA189819 to Christiana Care Health Services, Inc, UG1CA189858 to Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium, U10CA180820 to ECOG-ACRIN Medical Research Foundation, U10CA180819 to SWOG/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and P50CA221745. The research was also supported in part by Genentech and by support for the Alliance for Clinical Trials for Oncology (https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2021/8/1
Y1 - 2021/8/1
N2 - PURPOSE The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) is a standard therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Based on data that angiogenesis plays a role in urothelial carcinoma growth and progression, a randomized placebo-controlled trial was performed with the primary objective of testing whether patients treated with GC and bevacizumab (GCB) have superior overall survival (OS) than patients treated with GC and placebo (GCP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between July 2009 and December 2014, 506 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma without prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease and no neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy within 12 months were randomly assigned to receive either GCB or GCP. The primary end point was OS, with secondary end points of progression-free survival, objective response, and toxicity. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 76.3 months among alive patients, the median OS was 14.5 months for patients treated with GCB and 14.3 months for patients treated with GCP (hazard ratio for death 5 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.05; two-sided stratified log-rank P 5 .14). The median progression-free survival was 8.0 months for GCB and 6.7 months for GCP (hazard ratio 5 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.95; P 5 .016). The proportion of patients with grade 3 or greater adverse events did not differ significantly between both arms, although increased bevacizumab-related toxicities such as hypertension and proteinuria occurred in the bevacizumab-treated arm. CONCLUSION The addition of bevacizumab to GC did not result in improved OS. The observed median OS of about 14 months is consistent with prior phase III trials of cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
AB - PURPOSE The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) is a standard therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Based on data that angiogenesis plays a role in urothelial carcinoma growth and progression, a randomized placebo-controlled trial was performed with the primary objective of testing whether patients treated with GC and bevacizumab (GCB) have superior overall survival (OS) than patients treated with GC and placebo (GCP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between July 2009 and December 2014, 506 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma without prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease and no neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy within 12 months were randomly assigned to receive either GCB or GCP. The primary end point was OS, with secondary end points of progression-free survival, objective response, and toxicity. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 76.3 months among alive patients, the median OS was 14.5 months for patients treated with GCB and 14.3 months for patients treated with GCP (hazard ratio for death 5 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.05; two-sided stratified log-rank P 5 .14). The median progression-free survival was 8.0 months for GCB and 6.7 months for GCP (hazard ratio 5 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.95; P 5 .016). The proportion of patients with grade 3 or greater adverse events did not differ significantly between both arms, although increased bevacizumab-related toxicities such as hypertension and proteinuria occurred in the bevacizumab-treated arm. CONCLUSION The addition of bevacizumab to GC did not result in improved OS. The observed median OS of about 14 months is consistent with prior phase III trials of cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109861355&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.21.00286
DO - 10.1200/JCO.21.00286
M3 - Article
C2 - 33989025
AN - SCOPUS:85109861355
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 39
SP - 2486
EP - 2496
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 22
ER -