Randomized Double-Blind Phase II Study of Maintenance Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo after First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

  • Matthew D. Galsky
  • , Amir Mortazavi
  • , Matthew I. Milowsky
  • , Saby George
  • , Sumati Gupta
  • , Mark T. Fleming
  • , Long H. Dang
  • , Daniel M. Geynisman
  • , Radhika Walling
  • , Robert S. Alter
  • , Mohamad Kassar
  • , Jue Wang
  • , Shilpa Gupta
  • , Nancy Davis
  • , Joel Picus
  • , George Philips
  • , David I. Quinn
  • , G. Kenneth Haines
  • , Noah M. Hahn
  • , Qianqian Zhao
  • Menggang Yu, Sumanta K. Pal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

120 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE Platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer is typically administered for a fixed duration followed by observation until progression. “Switch maintenance” therapy with PD-1 blockade at the time of chemotherapy cessation may be attractive for mechanistic and pragmatic reasons. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic urothelial cancer achieving at least stable disease on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned double-blind 1:1 to switch maintenance pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks versus placebo for up to 24 months. Patients with disease progression on placebo could cross over to pembrolizumab. The primary objective was to determine the progression-free survival. Secondary objectives included determining overall survival as well as treatment outcomes according to PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS). RESULTS Between December 2015 and November 2018, 108 patients were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab (n 5 55) or placebo (n 5 53). The objective response rate was 23% with pembrolizumab and 10% with placebo. Treatment-emergent grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 59% receiving pembrolizumab and 38% of patients receiving placebo. Progression-free survival was significantly longer with maintenance pembrolizumab versus placebo (5.4 months [95% CI, 3.1 to 7.3 months] v 3.0 months [95% CI; 2.7 to 5.5 months]; hazard ratio, 0.65; log-rank P 5 .04; maximum efficiency robust test P 5 .039). Median overall survival was 22 months (95% CI, 12.9 months to not reached) with pembrolizumab and 18.7 months (95% CI, 11.4 months to not reached) with placebo. There was no significant interaction between PD-L1 CPS $ 10 and treatment arm for progression-free survival or overall survival. CONCLUSION Switch maintenance pembrolizumab leads to additional objective responses in patients achieving at least stable disease with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and prolongs progression-free survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1797-1806
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume38
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 10 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized Double-Blind Phase II Study of Maintenance Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo after First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this