TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative in vivo fusion assessment by 18F-fluoride PET/CT following en bloc spondylectomy
AU - Pumberger, Matthias
AU - Prasad, Vikas
AU - Druschel, Claudia
AU - Disch, Alexander C.
AU - Brenner, Winfried
AU - Schaser, Klaus Dieter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective analyses was to evaluate the bone viability in the ventral column of the spine following large segmental defect reconstructions. Osseous integration of implants following spinal fusion procedures is an essential precondition to provide adequate mechanical strength to any applied forces and subsequently satisfying patient outcomes. Although CT scan is the non-invasive gold standard for fusion assessment, it lacks the ability to visualize bone viability and, therefore, discrepancy remains about sensitivity and specificity of CT as evaluation tool of spinal fusion. Methods: A novel modality, 18F Fluoride PET/CT, specifically allows quantitative in vivo evaluation of metabolic activity of the osseous integration. Bone viability following large segmental reconstructions in patients after mono- and multi-level en bloc spondylectomies (EBS) was analyzed. Spinal fusion was assessed on plain radiographs and CT scans according to the FDA fusion criteria as well as 18F PET/CT. Results: A total of eight patients underwent 18F PET/CT were included (one 4-level-, one 3-level, two 2-level and four 1-level EBS). The average follow-up between EBS and radiographic studies was 24.8 months. On plain radiographs and CT scans, successful fusion was confirmed in all patients. However, 18F PET/CT showed non-union in all cases. The metabolic bone activity within the cage was fourfold decreased compared to the reference vertebra, whereas the metabolic activity of the adjacent endplates was 1.6-fold increased compared to the reference vertebra. Conclusion: This study suggests a discrepancy between fusion rates assessed by plain radiographs and CT scan compared to 18F PET/CT.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective analyses was to evaluate the bone viability in the ventral column of the spine following large segmental defect reconstructions. Osseous integration of implants following spinal fusion procedures is an essential precondition to provide adequate mechanical strength to any applied forces and subsequently satisfying patient outcomes. Although CT scan is the non-invasive gold standard for fusion assessment, it lacks the ability to visualize bone viability and, therefore, discrepancy remains about sensitivity and specificity of CT as evaluation tool of spinal fusion. Methods: A novel modality, 18F Fluoride PET/CT, specifically allows quantitative in vivo evaluation of metabolic activity of the osseous integration. Bone viability following large segmental reconstructions in patients after mono- and multi-level en bloc spondylectomies (EBS) was analyzed. Spinal fusion was assessed on plain radiographs and CT scans according to the FDA fusion criteria as well as 18F PET/CT. Results: A total of eight patients underwent 18F PET/CT were included (one 4-level-, one 3-level, two 2-level and four 1-level EBS). The average follow-up between EBS and radiographic studies was 24.8 months. On plain radiographs and CT scans, successful fusion was confirmed in all patients. However, 18F PET/CT showed non-union in all cases. The metabolic bone activity within the cage was fourfold decreased compared to the reference vertebra, whereas the metabolic activity of the adjacent endplates was 1.6-fold increased compared to the reference vertebra. Conclusion: This study suggests a discrepancy between fusion rates assessed by plain radiographs and CT scan compared to 18F PET/CT.
KW - F-Fluoride PET/CT
KW - Bone viability
KW - Cage fusion
KW - En bloc spondylectomy
KW - Fusion assessment
KW - Non-union
KW - Spine fusion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958743130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00586-015-4121-9
DO - 10.1007/s00586-015-4121-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 26374129
AN - SCOPUS:84958743130
SN - 0940-6719
VL - 25
SP - 836
EP - 842
JO - European Spine Journal
JF - European Spine Journal
IS - 3
ER -