TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative imaging biomarkers
T2 - A review of statistical methods for technical performance assessment
AU - Raunig, David L.
AU - McShane, Lisa M.
AU - Pennello, Gene
AU - Gatsonis, Constantine
AU - Carson, Paul L.
AU - Voyvodic, James T.
AU - Wahl, Richard L.
AU - Kurland, Brenda F.
AU - Schwarz, Adam J.
AU - Gönen, Mithat
AU - Zahlmann, Gudrun
AU - Kondratovich, Marina V.
AU - O'Donnell, Kevin
AU - Petrick, Nicholas
AU - Cole, Patricia E.
AU - Garra, Brian
AU - Sullivan, Daniel C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.
PY - 2015/2/27
Y1 - 2015/2/27
N2 - Technological developments and greater rigor in the quantitative measurement of biological features in medical images have given rise to an increased interest in using quantitative imaging biomarkers to measure changes in these features. Critical to the performance of a quantitative imaging biomarker in preclinical or clinical settings are three primary metrology areas of interest: measurement linearity and bias, repeatability, and the ability to consistently reproduce equivalent results when conditions change, as would be expected in any clinical trial. Unfortunately, performance studies to date differ greatly in designs, analysis method, and metrics used to assess a quantitative imaging biomarker for clinical use. It is therefore difficult or not possible to integrate results from different studies or to use reported results to design studies. The Radiological Society of North America and the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance with technical, radiological, and statistical experts developed a set of technical performance analysis methods, metrics, and study designs that provide terminology, metrics, and methods consistent with widely accepted metrological standards. This document provides a consistent framework for the conduct and evaluation of quantitative imaging biomarker performance studies so that results from multiple studies can be compared, contrasted, or combined.
AB - Technological developments and greater rigor in the quantitative measurement of biological features in medical images have given rise to an increased interest in using quantitative imaging biomarkers to measure changes in these features. Critical to the performance of a quantitative imaging biomarker in preclinical or clinical settings are three primary metrology areas of interest: measurement linearity and bias, repeatability, and the ability to consistently reproduce equivalent results when conditions change, as would be expected in any clinical trial. Unfortunately, performance studies to date differ greatly in designs, analysis method, and metrics used to assess a quantitative imaging biomarker for clinical use. It is therefore difficult or not possible to integrate results from different studies or to use reported results to design studies. The Radiological Society of North America and the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance with technical, radiological, and statistical experts developed a set of technical performance analysis methods, metrics, and study designs that provide terminology, metrics, and methods consistent with widely accepted metrological standards. This document provides a consistent framework for the conduct and evaluation of quantitative imaging biomarker performance studies so that results from multiple studies can be compared, contrasted, or combined.
KW - agreement
KW - bias
KW - imaging biomarkers
KW - linearity
KW - precision
KW - quantitative imaging
KW - reliability
KW - repeatability
KW - reproducibility
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988215602&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0962280214537344
DO - 10.1177/0962280214537344
M3 - Review article
C2 - 24919831
AN - SCOPUS:84988215602
SN - 0962-2802
VL - 24
SP - 27
EP - 67
JO - Statistical Methods in Medical Research
JF - Statistical Methods in Medical Research
IS - 1
ER -