TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantifying the Contribution of Lower Limb Compensation to Upright Posture
T2 - What Happens if Adult Spinal Deformity Patients Do Not Compensate?
AU - Lafage, Renaud
AU - Duvvuri, Priya
AU - Elysee, Jonathan
AU - Diebo, Bassel
AU - Bess, Shay
AU - Burton, Douglas
AU - Daniels, Alan
AU - Gupta, Munish
AU - Hostin, Richard
AU - Kebaish, Khaled
AU - Kelly, Michael
AU - Kim, Han Jo
AU - Klineberg, Eric
AU - Lenke, Lawrence
AU - Lewis, Stephen
AU - Ames, Christopher
AU - Passias, Peter
AU - Protopsaltis, Themistocles
AU - Shaffrey, Christopher
AU - Smith, Justin S.
AU - Schwab, Frank
AU - Lafage, Virginie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/8/1
Y1 - 2023/8/1
N2 - Study Design. This is a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Objective. This study tests the hypothesis that the elimination of lower limb compensation in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) will significantly increase the magnitude of sagittal malalignment. Summary of Background Data. ASD affects a significant proportion of the elderly population, impairing functional sagittal alignment and inhibiting the overall quality of life. To counteract these effects, patients with ASD use their spine, pelvis, and lower limbs to create a compensatory posture that allows for standing and mobility. However, the degree to which each of the hips, knees, and ankles contributes to these compensatory mechanisms has yet to be determined. Methods. Patients undergoing corrective surgery for ASD were included if they met at least one of the following criteria: complex surgical procedure, geriatric deformity surgery, or severe radiographic deformity. Preoperative full-body x-rays were evaluated, and age and pelvic incidence -adjusted normative values were used to model spine alignment based upon three positions: compensated (all lower extremity compensatory mechanisms maintained), partially compensated (removal of ankle dorsiflexion and knee flexion, with maintained hip extension), and uncompensated (ankle, knee, and hip compensation set to the age and pelvic incidence norms). Results. A total of 288 patients were included (mean age 60 yr, 70.5% females). As the model transitioned from the compensated to uncompensated position, the initial posterior translation of the pelvis decreased significantly to an anterior translation versus the ankle (P.Shift: 30 to -7.6 mm). This was associated with a decrease in pelvic retroversion (pelvic tilt: 24.1-16.1), hip extension (SFA: 203-200), knee flexion (knee angle: 5.5-0.4), and ankle dorsiflexion (ankle angle: 5.3-3.7). As a result, the anterior malalignment of the trunk significantly increased: sagittal vertical axis (65-120 mm) and G-SVA (C7-ankle from 36 to 127 mm). Conclusions. Removal of lower limbs compensation revealed an unsustainable truncal malalignment with two-fold greater SVA.
AB - Study Design. This is a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Objective. This study tests the hypothesis that the elimination of lower limb compensation in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) will significantly increase the magnitude of sagittal malalignment. Summary of Background Data. ASD affects a significant proportion of the elderly population, impairing functional sagittal alignment and inhibiting the overall quality of life. To counteract these effects, patients with ASD use their spine, pelvis, and lower limbs to create a compensatory posture that allows for standing and mobility. However, the degree to which each of the hips, knees, and ankles contributes to these compensatory mechanisms has yet to be determined. Methods. Patients undergoing corrective surgery for ASD were included if they met at least one of the following criteria: complex surgical procedure, geriatric deformity surgery, or severe radiographic deformity. Preoperative full-body x-rays were evaluated, and age and pelvic incidence -adjusted normative values were used to model spine alignment based upon three positions: compensated (all lower extremity compensatory mechanisms maintained), partially compensated (removal of ankle dorsiflexion and knee flexion, with maintained hip extension), and uncompensated (ankle, knee, and hip compensation set to the age and pelvic incidence norms). Results. A total of 288 patients were included (mean age 60 yr, 70.5% females). As the model transitioned from the compensated to uncompensated position, the initial posterior translation of the pelvis decreased significantly to an anterior translation versus the ankle (P.Shift: 30 to -7.6 mm). This was associated with a decrease in pelvic retroversion (pelvic tilt: 24.1-16.1), hip extension (SFA: 203-200), knee flexion (knee angle: 5.5-0.4), and ankle dorsiflexion (ankle angle: 5.3-3.7). As a result, the anterior malalignment of the trunk significantly increased: sagittal vertical axis (65-120 mm) and G-SVA (C7-ankle from 36 to 127 mm). Conclusions. Removal of lower limbs compensation revealed an unsustainable truncal malalignment with two-fold greater SVA.
KW - adult spinal deformity
KW - hip extension
KW - knee flexion
KW - lower limb compensation
KW - pelvic retroversion
KW - pelvic shift
KW - pelvic tilt
KW - sagittal alignment
KW - sagittal deformity
KW - sagittal vertical axis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165221417&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004646
DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004646
M3 - Article
C2 - 36972137
AN - SCOPUS:85165221417
SN - 0362-2436
VL - 48
SP - 1082
EP - 1088
JO - Spine
JF - Spine
IS - 15
ER -