TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality of life outcomes from the Exercise and Nutrition Enhance Recovery and Good Health for You (ENERGY)-randomized weight loss trial among breast cancer survivors
AU - Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
AU - Colditz, Graham A.
AU - Rock, Cheryl L.
AU - Sedjo, Rebecca L.
AU - Liu, Jingxia
AU - Wolin, Kathleen Y.
AU - Krontiras, Helen
AU - Byers, Tim
AU - Pakiz, Bilgé
AU - Parker, Barbara A.
AU - Naughton, Michael
AU - Elias, Anthony
AU - Ganz, Patricia A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by NCI Grant CA148791. Management of stored biological samples at the UCSD Coordinating Center was facilitated by the Diet and Physical Activity Shared Resource of the Moores UCSD Cancer Center (NCI Cancer Center Support Grant CA23100). The Colorado Clinical Translational Sciences Institute Grant (NIH CTSI Grant TR001082) supported study activities at the University of Colorado. This publication also was made possible by grant number UL1 RR024992 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the National Center for Research Resources or NIH. We thank the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, Missouri, for the use of the Tissue Procurement Core, which provided sample storage and processing (supported in part by an NCI Cancer Center Support Grant CA91842). The authors thank the data and safety monitoring committee: Bernard Rosner, Ph.D, Joanne Mortimer, MD, Ken Fujioka MD, Frank Greenway, MD, and Linda Litzau. The authors thank Catherine Alfano, Ph.D (Program Officer), and Julia Rowland, Ph.D, NIH Office of Cancer Survivorship, and also Robert Croyle, Ph.D, NIH Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, for their assistance, guidance, and support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2015/11/1
Y1 - 2015/11/1
N2 - Obesity is a poor prognostic factor and is negatively related to quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer survivors. Exercise and Nutrition to Enhance Recovery and Good Health for You is the largest weight loss trial completed among cancer survivors. Percent losses in body weight with an intensive group-based intervention versus an attention control were 6.0 versus 1.5 % (p < 0.0001) and 3.7 versus 1.3 % (p < 0.0001) at 12 and 24 months, respectively. ENERGY also was designed to answer the research question: Does weight loss significantly improve vitality and physical function (key components of QOL)? 692 breast cancer survivors (BMI: 25–45 kg/m2) at 4 US sites were randomized to a year-long intensive intervention of 52 group sessions and telephone counseling contacts versus a non-intensive (control) of two in-person counseling sessions. Weight, self-reported QOL, and symptoms were measured semi-annually for two years. Significant decreases in physical function and increases in symptoms were observed among controls from baseline to 6 months, but not in the intervention arm, −3.45 (95 % Confidence Interval [CI] −6.10, −0.79, p = 0.0109) and 0.10 (95 %CI 0.04, 0.16, p = 0.0021), respectively. Improvements in vitality were seen in both arms but trended toward greater improvement in the intervention arm −2.72 (95 % CI −5.45, 0.01, p = 0.0508). These differences diminished over time; however, depressive symptoms increased in the intervention versus control arms and became significant at 24 months, −1.64 (95 % CI −3.13, −0.15, p = 0.0308). Increased QOL has been reported in shorter term diet and exercise trials among cancer survivors. These longer term data suggest that diet and exercise interventions improve some aspects of QOL, but these benefits may diminish over time.
AB - Obesity is a poor prognostic factor and is negatively related to quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer survivors. Exercise and Nutrition to Enhance Recovery and Good Health for You is the largest weight loss trial completed among cancer survivors. Percent losses in body weight with an intensive group-based intervention versus an attention control were 6.0 versus 1.5 % (p < 0.0001) and 3.7 versus 1.3 % (p < 0.0001) at 12 and 24 months, respectively. ENERGY also was designed to answer the research question: Does weight loss significantly improve vitality and physical function (key components of QOL)? 692 breast cancer survivors (BMI: 25–45 kg/m2) at 4 US sites were randomized to a year-long intensive intervention of 52 group sessions and telephone counseling contacts versus a non-intensive (control) of two in-person counseling sessions. Weight, self-reported QOL, and symptoms were measured semi-annually for two years. Significant decreases in physical function and increases in symptoms were observed among controls from baseline to 6 months, but not in the intervention arm, −3.45 (95 % Confidence Interval [CI] −6.10, −0.79, p = 0.0109) and 0.10 (95 %CI 0.04, 0.16, p = 0.0021), respectively. Improvements in vitality were seen in both arms but trended toward greater improvement in the intervention arm −2.72 (95 % CI −5.45, 0.01, p = 0.0508). These differences diminished over time; however, depressive symptoms increased in the intervention versus control arms and became significant at 24 months, −1.64 (95 % CI −3.13, −0.15, p = 0.0308). Increased QOL has been reported in shorter term diet and exercise trials among cancer survivors. These longer term data suggest that diet and exercise interventions improve some aspects of QOL, but these benefits may diminish over time.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Obesity
KW - Physical function
KW - Quality of life
KW - Symptoms
KW - Weight loss
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947484486&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10549-015-3627-5
DO - 10.1007/s10549-015-3627-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 26518022
AN - SCOPUS:84947484486
SN - 0167-6806
VL - 154
SP - 329
EP - 337
JO - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
JF - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
IS - 2
ER -