TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality assurance and quantitative imaging biomarkers in low-dose cT lung cancer screening
AU - Rydzak, Chara E.
AU - Armato, Samuel G.
AU - Avila, Ricardo S.
AU - Mulshine, James L.
AU - Yankelevitz, David F.
AU - Gierada, David S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - After years of assessment through controlled clinical trials, low-dose CT screening for lung cancer is becoming part of clinical practice. As with any cancer screening test, those undergoing lung cancer screening are not being evaluated for concerning signs or symptoms, but are generally in good health and proactively trying to prevent premature death. Given the resultant obligation to achieve the screening aim of early diagnosis while also minimizing the potential for morbidity from workup of indeterminate but ultimately benign screening abnormalities, careful implementation of screening with conformance to currently recognized best practices and a focus on quality assurance is essential. In this review, we address the importance of each component of the screening process to optimize the effectiveness of CT screening, discussing options for quality assurance at each step. We also discuss the potential added advantages, quality assurance requirements and current status of quantitative imaging biomarkers related to lung cancer screening. Finally, we highlight suggestions for improvements and needs for further evidence in evaluating the performance of CT screening as it transitions from the research trial setting into daily clinical practice.
AB - After years of assessment through controlled clinical trials, low-dose CT screening for lung cancer is becoming part of clinical practice. As with any cancer screening test, those undergoing lung cancer screening are not being evaluated for concerning signs or symptoms, but are generally in good health and proactively trying to prevent premature death. Given the resultant obligation to achieve the screening aim of early diagnosis while also minimizing the potential for morbidity from workup of indeterminate but ultimately benign screening abnormalities, careful implementation of screening with conformance to currently recognized best practices and a focus on quality assurance is essential. In this review, we address the importance of each component of the screening process to optimize the effectiveness of CT screening, discussing options for quality assurance at each step. We also discuss the potential added advantages, quality assurance requirements and current status of quantitative imaging biomarkers related to lung cancer screening. Finally, we highlight suggestions for improvements and needs for further evidence in evaluating the performance of CT screening as it transitions from the research trial setting into daily clinical practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054424810&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1259/bjr.20170401
DO - 10.1259/bjr.20170401
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28830225
AN - SCOPUS:85054424810
SN - 0007-1285
VL - 91
JO - British Journal of Radiology
JF - British Journal of Radiology
IS - 1090
M1 - 20170401
ER -