qSOFA score: Predictive validity in Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations


Purpose To determine whether the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) retains predictive validity in patients with Enterobacteriaceae sepsis that all received appropriate initial antimicrobial therapy. Materials and methods Retrospective cohort at Barnes-Jewish Hospital including individuals with Enterobacteriaceae sepsis receiving appropriate initial antimicrobial therapy between 6/2009–12/2013. Outcomes were compared according to qSOFA score and sepsis classification. Results We identified 510 patients with Enterobacteriaceae sepsis; 67 (13.1%) died. Mortality was higher in patients with qSOFA scores of 2 or 3 than those with scores of 0 or 1 (13.3% and 42.4% versus 5.1% and 1.8%). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, altered mental status (AMS) alone or qSOFA score ≥ 2 were both predictors of mortality with odds ratios of 8.01 and 5.39, respectively. Regardless of sepsis severity, non-survivors were significantly more likely to have AMS than survivors. Sepsis severity, qSOFA, and AMS had comparable predictive validity for mortality. Conclusions Our results support qSOFA score, AMS, and sepsis severity as acceptable bedside tools for prognostication during initial clinical assessment in patients with sepsis. qSOFA retained its predictive validity in this cohort, suggesting that appropriate initial antimicrobial therapy is not an effect modifier for mortality when using qSOFA for prognostication.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-147
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Critical Care
StatePublished - Feb 2018


  • Enterobacteriaceae sepsis
  • Quick SOFA
  • qSOFA


Dive into the research topics of 'qSOFA score: Predictive validity in Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this