TY - JOUR
T1 - Pyrolytic Carbon Arthroplasty for Posttraumatic Arthritis of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint
AU - Nunley, Ryan M.
AU - Boyer, Martin I.
AU - Goldfarb, Charles A.
PY - 2006/11
Y1 - 2006/11
N2 - Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the subjective and objective functional outcome of patients treated with a pyrolytic carbon proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis. Methods: Five patients (7 joints) with traumatic injuries to the PIP joint were followed up for more than 1 year after pyrolytic carbon arthroplasty. All patients were treated with surgical reduction and stabilization at the time of the initial injury, but at a minimum of 6 months after the initial injury they had persistent pain, loss of motion, and functional limitations. All patients had a stable PIP joint with a satisfactory extensor mechanism but had radiographic evidence of posttraumatic arthritis. Patients were evaluated before and after arthroplasty with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and visual analog scale and by radiographic and physical examination. Results: At an average of 17 months, the mean DASH questionnaire score was unchanged. The pain rating on the visual analog scale was 6 out of 10 before surgery and 4 out of 10 after surgery; this change was not statistically significant. The average range of motion of the PIP joint decreased by 10° at the last evaluation. Grip strength improved from an average of 47 lb to 63 lb after surgery. Conclusions: The subjective and objective functional outcomes in 5 patients more than 1 year after pyrolytic carbon PIP joint arthroplasty for PIP joint trauma were disappointing. For posttraumatic patients, we no longer use pyrolytic carbon PIP joint arthroplasty. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.
AB - Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the subjective and objective functional outcome of patients treated with a pyrolytic carbon proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis. Methods: Five patients (7 joints) with traumatic injuries to the PIP joint were followed up for more than 1 year after pyrolytic carbon arthroplasty. All patients were treated with surgical reduction and stabilization at the time of the initial injury, but at a minimum of 6 months after the initial injury they had persistent pain, loss of motion, and functional limitations. All patients had a stable PIP joint with a satisfactory extensor mechanism but had radiographic evidence of posttraumatic arthritis. Patients were evaluated before and after arthroplasty with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and visual analog scale and by radiographic and physical examination. Results: At an average of 17 months, the mean DASH questionnaire score was unchanged. The pain rating on the visual analog scale was 6 out of 10 before surgery and 4 out of 10 after surgery; this change was not statistically significant. The average range of motion of the PIP joint decreased by 10° at the last evaluation. Grip strength improved from an average of 47 lb to 63 lb after surgery. Conclusions: The subjective and objective functional outcomes in 5 patients more than 1 year after pyrolytic carbon PIP joint arthroplasty for PIP joint trauma were disappointing. For posttraumatic patients, we no longer use pyrolytic carbon PIP joint arthroplasty. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.
KW - PIP joint
KW - Pyrolytic carbon
KW - functional outcome
KW - posttraumatic arthritis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750622916&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.07.017
DO - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.07.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 17095375
AN - SCOPUS:33750622916
SN - 0363-5023
VL - 31
SP - 1468
EP - 1474
JO - Journal of Hand Surgery
JF - Journal of Hand Surgery
IS - 9
ER -