TY - JOUR
T1 - Provider knowledge, beliefs, and self-efficacy to deprescribe opioids and sedative-hypnotics
AU - Gray, Shelly L.
AU - Fornaro, Rachyl
AU - Turner, Justin
AU - Boudreau, Denise M.
AU - Wellman, Robert
AU - Tannenbaum, Cara
AU - Marcum, Zachary A.
AU - Balderson, Benjamin
AU - Cook, Andrea
AU - Jacobsen, Anna Liss
AU - Phelan, Elizabeth A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The American Geriatrics Society.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Background: While many studies have assessed and measured patient attitudes toward deprescribing, less quantitative research has addressed the provider perspective. We thus sought to describe provider knowledge, beliefs, and self-efficacy to deprescribe, with a focus on opioids and sedative-hypnotics. Methods: An electronic anonymous survey was distributed to primary care providers at Kaiser Permanente Washington. Two reminder emails were sent. The survey included 10 questions on general deprescribing, and six questions each specific to opioid and sedative-hypnotic deprescribing. Knowledge questions used a multiple-choice response option format. Questions addressing beliefs and self-efficacy (i.e., confidence) used a 0–10 Likert scale. Scales were dichotomized at ≥7 to define agreement (belief questions) or confidence (self-efficacy questions). We calculated descriptive statistics to summarize the responses. Results: Of 370 eligible primary care providers, 95 (26%) completed the survey. For general deprescribing questions, a majority believed that lack of patient willingness, withdrawal symptoms and fear of symptom return, and time constraints impeded deprescribing. Approximately half chose the correct answers about opioid deprescribing, 21% were confident that they could alleviate patient concerns about opioid tapering, and 32% were confident managing chronic non-cancer pain without opioids. For sedative-hypnotics, 64%–87% of respondents correctly answered questions about risks and the relative effectiveness of alternatives, but only one-third correctly answered a question about sedative-hypnotic tapering. Roughly half were confident in their ability to successfully engage patients in sedative deprescribing conversations and select alternatives. Only 54% and 34% were confident in writing a tapering protocol for opioids and sedative-hypnotics, respectively. Conclusion: Results suggest that raising provider awareness of patient willingness to deprescribe, addressing knowledge gaps, and increasing self-efficacy for deprescribing are important targets for improving deprescribing. Support for writing tapering protocols and prescribing evidence-based drug and non-drug alternatives may be important to improve care.
AB - Background: While many studies have assessed and measured patient attitudes toward deprescribing, less quantitative research has addressed the provider perspective. We thus sought to describe provider knowledge, beliefs, and self-efficacy to deprescribe, with a focus on opioids and sedative-hypnotics. Methods: An electronic anonymous survey was distributed to primary care providers at Kaiser Permanente Washington. Two reminder emails were sent. The survey included 10 questions on general deprescribing, and six questions each specific to opioid and sedative-hypnotic deprescribing. Knowledge questions used a multiple-choice response option format. Questions addressing beliefs and self-efficacy (i.e., confidence) used a 0–10 Likert scale. Scales were dichotomized at ≥7 to define agreement (belief questions) or confidence (self-efficacy questions). We calculated descriptive statistics to summarize the responses. Results: Of 370 eligible primary care providers, 95 (26%) completed the survey. For general deprescribing questions, a majority believed that lack of patient willingness, withdrawal symptoms and fear of symptom return, and time constraints impeded deprescribing. Approximately half chose the correct answers about opioid deprescribing, 21% were confident that they could alleviate patient concerns about opioid tapering, and 32% were confident managing chronic non-cancer pain without opioids. For sedative-hypnotics, 64%–87% of respondents correctly answered questions about risks and the relative effectiveness of alternatives, but only one-third correctly answered a question about sedative-hypnotic tapering. Roughly half were confident in their ability to successfully engage patients in sedative deprescribing conversations and select alternatives. Only 54% and 34% were confident in writing a tapering protocol for opioids and sedative-hypnotics, respectively. Conclusion: Results suggest that raising provider awareness of patient willingness to deprescribe, addressing knowledge gaps, and increasing self-efficacy for deprescribing are important targets for improving deprescribing. Support for writing tapering protocols and prescribing evidence-based drug and non-drug alternatives may be important to improve care.
KW - barriers
KW - deprescribing
KW - provider
KW - self-efficacy
KW - survey
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85145025661
U2 - 10.1111/jgs.18202
DO - 10.1111/jgs.18202
M3 - Article
C2 - 36546768
AN - SCOPUS:85145025661
SN - 0002-8614
VL - 71
SP - 1580
EP - 1586
JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
IS - 5
ER -