TY - JOUR
T1 - ProVal
T2 - A Protein-Scoring Function for the Selection of Native and Near-Native Folds
AU - Berglund, Anders
AU - Head, Richard D.
AU - Welsh, Eric A.
AU - Marshall, Garland R.
PY - 2004/2/1
Y1 - 2004/2/1
N2 - A low-resolution scoring function for the selection of native and near-native structures from a set of predicted structures for a given protein sequence has been developed. The scoring function, ProVal (Protein Validate), used several variables that describe an aspect of protein structure for which the proximity to the native structure can be assessed quantitatively. Among the parameters included are a packing estimate, surface areas, and the contact order. A partial least squares for latent variables (PLS) model was built for each candidate set of the 28 decoy sets of structures generated for 22 different proteins using the described parameters as independent variables. The Cα RMS of the candidate structures versus the experimental structure was used as the dependent variable. The final generalized scoring function was an average of all models derived, ensuring that the function was not optimized for specific fold classes or method of structure generation of the candidate folds. The results show that the crystal structure was scored best in 64% of the 28 test sets and was clearly separated from the decoys in many examples. In all the other cases in which the crystal structure did not rank first, it ranked within the top 10%. Thus, although ProVal could not distinguish between predicted structures that were similar overall in fold quality due to its inherently low resolution, it can clearly be used as a primary filter to eliminate ∼90% of fold candidates generated by current prediction methods from all-atom modeling and further evaluation. The correlation between the predicted and actual Cα RMS values varies considerably between the candidate fold sets.
AB - A low-resolution scoring function for the selection of native and near-native structures from a set of predicted structures for a given protein sequence has been developed. The scoring function, ProVal (Protein Validate), used several variables that describe an aspect of protein structure for which the proximity to the native structure can be assessed quantitatively. Among the parameters included are a packing estimate, surface areas, and the contact order. A partial least squares for latent variables (PLS) model was built for each candidate set of the 28 decoy sets of structures generated for 22 different proteins using the described parameters as independent variables. The Cα RMS of the candidate structures versus the experimental structure was used as the dependent variable. The final generalized scoring function was an average of all models derived, ensuring that the function was not optimized for specific fold classes or method of structure generation of the candidate folds. The results show that the crystal structure was scored best in 64% of the 28 test sets and was clearly separated from the decoys in many examples. In all the other cases in which the crystal structure did not rank first, it ranked within the top 10%. Thus, although ProVal could not distinguish between predicted structures that were similar overall in fold quality due to its inherently low resolution, it can clearly be used as a primary filter to eliminate ∼90% of fold candidates generated by current prediction methods from all-atom modeling and further evaluation. The correlation between the predicted and actual Cα RMS values varies considerably between the candidate fold sets.
KW - Empirical scoring function
KW - PLS
KW - Partial least squares
KW - Protein folding
KW - Structure prediction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345827706&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/prot.10523
DO - 10.1002/prot.10523
M3 - Article
C2 - 14696191
AN - SCOPUS:0345827706
SN - 0887-3585
VL - 54
SP - 289
EP - 302
JO - Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics
JF - Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics
IS - 2
ER -