Prostate cancer specific survival in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial

Paul F. Pinsky, Amanda Black, Howard L. Parnes, Robert Grubb, E. David Crawford, Anthony Miller, Douglas Reding, Gerald Andriole

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The prostate component of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) randomized screening trial demonstrated no mortality effect of screening. Here we analyze prostate cancer specific survival in PLCO and its relation to screening. Methods: 76,693 men aged 55-74 were randomized to usual care (n=38,350) or intervention (n=38,343). Intervention arm men received annual prostate-specific antigen (6 years) and digital rectal exam (4 years). Men were followed for cancer diagnosis and mortality through 13 years. Medical record abstractors confirmed prostate cancer diagnoses, stage and grade. Prostate-specific survival in PLCO cases was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and proportional hazards modeling. We utilized data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program to compute expected survival in PLCO and compared this to observed. Results: There was no significant difference in prostate-specific survival rates between arms; 10 year survival rates were 94.7% (intervention, n=4250 cases) versus 93.5% (usual care, n=3815 cases). Within the intervention arm, cases never screened in PLCO had lower 10 year survival rates (82%) than screen detected or interval (following a negative screen) cases, both around 95.5%. The ratio of observed to expected 10 year prostate-specific death (1-survival) rates was 0.59 (95% CI: 0.51-0.68) for all PLCO cases, 0.66 (95% CI: 0.51-0.81) for Gleason 5-7 cases and 1.07 (95% CI: 0.87-1.3) for Gleason 8-10 cases. Conclusion: Prostate cancer specific survival in PLCO was comparable across arms and significantly better than expected based on nationwide population data. How much of the better survival is due to a healthy volunteer effect and to lead-time and overdiagnosis biases is not readily determinable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e401-e406
JournalCancer Epidemiology
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

Keywords

  • Gleason grade
  • PSA
  • Prostate cancer
  • Screening
  • Survival

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prostate cancer specific survival in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this