Prospective Memory and What Costs Do Not Reveal About Retrieval Processes: A Commentary on Smith, Hunt, McVay, and McConnell (2007)

Gilles O. Einstein, Mark A. McDaniel

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

109 Scopus citations

Abstract

On the basis of consistently finding significant overall costs to the ongoing task with a single salient target event, Smith, Hunt, McVay, and McConnell (2007) concluded that preparatory attentional processes are required for prospective remembering and that spontaneous retrieval does not occur. In this article, we argue that overall costs are not completely informative in terms of specifying the underlying processes mediating prospective memory retrieval, and we suggest more promising approaches for testing for the existence of these processes. We also argue that counterbalancing in a within-subjects design is one of several proper methods for assessing costs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1082-1088
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010

Keywords

  • Monitoring
  • Multiprocess theory
  • Preparatory attentional processes
  • Prospective memory
  • Spontaneous retrieval

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective Memory and What Costs Do Not Reveal About Retrieval Processes: A Commentary on Smith, Hunt, McVay, and McConnell (2007)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this