Prospective follow-up of quality of life for participants undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or ovarian cancer screening in GOG-0199: An NRG Oncology/GOG study

Phuong L. Mai, Helen Q. Huang, Lari B. Wenzel, Paul K. Han, Richard P. Moser, Gustavo C. Rodriguez, John Boggess, Thomas J. Rutherford, David E. Cohn, Noah D. Kauff, Kelly Anne Phillips, Kelly Wilkinson, Robert M. Wenham, Chad Hamilton, Matthew A. Powell, Joan L. Walker, Mark H. Greene, Martee L. Hensley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) and ovarian cancer screening (OCS) are management options for women at increased risk of ovarian cancer. Long-term effects of these interventions on quality of life (QOL) are not well understood. Methods: GOG-0199 is a prospective cohort study of women at increased ovarian cancer risk who chose either RRSO or OCS as their risk management intervention. At study entry, 6, 12, 24 and 60 months of follow-up, participants completed the QOL questionnaire, which included the Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36, the Impact of Events Scales, the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Endocrine Subscale, and the Sexual Activity Questionnaire. QOL measures were compared between the RRSO and OCS cohort at baseline and over time. Results: Five-hundred-sixty-two participants in the RRSO cohort and 1,010 in the OCS completed the baseline and at least one follow-up questionnaire. At baseline, participants selecting RRSO reported lower health-related QOL (HRQOL), greater ovarian cancer-related stress, greater anxiety, and more depressive symptomatology, which improved during follow-up, especially for ovarian cancer-related stress. Screening was not found to adversely impact HRQOL. Hormone-related menopausal symptoms worsened and sexual functioning declined during follow-up in both cohorts, but more so among participants who underwent RRSO. Conclusions: HRQOL improved after surgery among women who chose RRSO and remained stable among participants undergoing screening. The adverse effects of RRSO and screening on short-term and long-term sexual activity and sexual functioning warrant consideration in the decision-making process for high-risk women.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-139
Number of pages9
JournalGynecologic oncology
Volume156
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective follow-up of quality of life for participants undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or ovarian cancer screening in GOG-0199: An NRG Oncology/GOG study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this