TY - JOUR
T1 - Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials
AU - Kurland, Brenda F.
AU - Gerstner, Elizabeth R.
AU - Mountz, James M.
AU - Schwartz, Lawrence H.
AU - Ryan, Christopher W.
AU - Graham, Michael M.
AU - Buatti, John M.
AU - Fennessy, Fiona M.
AU - Eikman, Edward A.
AU - Kumar, Virendra
AU - Forster, Kenneth M.
AU - Wahl, Richard L.
AU - Lieberman, Frank S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is supported by the National Institutes of Health, Quantitative Imaging Network ( U01-CA148131 ). The authors are grateful to Robert Nordstrom, Larry Clarke, Hannah Linden, David Mankoff, Mark Muzi, Savannah Partridge, Mia Levy and Daniel Rubin for helpful discussions and to Alicia DePastino for administrative support.
PY - 2012/11
Y1 - 2012/11
N2 - Quantitative imaging using computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography modalities will play an increasingly important role in the design of oncology trials addressing molecularly targeted, personalized therapies. The advent of molecularly targeted therapies, exemplified by antiangiogenic drugs, creates new complexities in the assessment of response. The Quantitative Imaging Network addresses the need for imaging modalities which can accurately and reproducibly measure not just change in tumor size but changes in relevant metabolic parameters, modulation of relevant signaling pathways, drug delivery to tumor and differentiation of apoptotic cell death from other changes in tumor volume. This article provides an overview of the applications of quantitative imaging to phase 0 through phase 3 oncology trials. We describe the use of a range of quantitative imaging modalities in specific tumor types including malignant gliomas, lung cancer, head and neck cancer, lymphoma, breast cancer, prostate cancer and sarcoma. In the concluding section, we discuss potential constraints on clinical trials using quantitative imaging, including complexity of trial conduct, impact on subject recruitment, incremental costs and institutional barriers. Strategies for overcoming these constraints are presented.
AB - Quantitative imaging using computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography modalities will play an increasingly important role in the design of oncology trials addressing molecularly targeted, personalized therapies. The advent of molecularly targeted therapies, exemplified by antiangiogenic drugs, creates new complexities in the assessment of response. The Quantitative Imaging Network addresses the need for imaging modalities which can accurately and reproducibly measure not just change in tumor size but changes in relevant metabolic parameters, modulation of relevant signaling pathways, drug delivery to tumor and differentiation of apoptotic cell death from other changes in tumor volume. This article provides an overview of the applications of quantitative imaging to phase 0 through phase 3 oncology trials. We describe the use of a range of quantitative imaging modalities in specific tumor types including malignant gliomas, lung cancer, head and neck cancer, lymphoma, breast cancer, prostate cancer and sarcoma. In the concluding section, we discuss potential constraints on clinical trials using quantitative imaging, including complexity of trial conduct, impact on subject recruitment, incremental costs and institutional barriers. Strategies for overcoming these constraints are presented.
KW - CT
KW - Cancer
KW - Clinical trials
KW - MRI
KW - PET
KW - Quantitative imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867138623&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.009
DO - 10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 22898682
AN - SCOPUS:84867138623
SN - 0730-725X
VL - 30
SP - 1301
EP - 1312
JO - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
IS - 9
ER -