TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic value of the ratio of metastatic lymph nodes in gastric cancer
T2 - An analysis based on a Chinese population
AU - Xi, Wang
AU - Fei, Wan
AU - Jun, Pan
AU - Yu, Guan Zhen
AU - Ying, Chen
AU - Wang, Jie Jun
PY - 2009/5/1
Y1 - 2009/5/1
N2 - Background and Objectives: To determine the prognostic value of the ratio of metastatic lymph nodes (RML) for gastric cancer and compare it to the prognostic value of the number-based pN classification. Methods: The survival of 513 patients who underwent curative resection between 2000 and 2005 was retrieved. The prognostic value of two factors for nodal status: RML classification (RML0, 0%; RML1, ≤30%; RML2, ≤50%; RML3, >50%) and pN classification (6th TNM system), was analyzed. Results: Both RML and pN classifications were independent prognostic factors when considered separately in multivariate analysis (P-values <0.05). Moreover, the proportion of explained variation (PEV) analysis showed that each classification had more prognostic value than other prognostic factors in two models respectively (P-values<0.05). The D-measure for prognostic separation was 1.563 versus 1.383 for RML versus pN. Bootstrap results for the difference of D-measures did not show a significant difference between RML and pN in terms of prognostic power (95% CI, -0.102 to 0.175). Conclusions: RML is an independent prognostic factor for gastric cancer. However, no significant evidence is found to support the hypothesis that RML classification carries more prognostic value than pN classification.
AB - Background and Objectives: To determine the prognostic value of the ratio of metastatic lymph nodes (RML) for gastric cancer and compare it to the prognostic value of the number-based pN classification. Methods: The survival of 513 patients who underwent curative resection between 2000 and 2005 was retrieved. The prognostic value of two factors for nodal status: RML classification (RML0, 0%; RML1, ≤30%; RML2, ≤50%; RML3, >50%) and pN classification (6th TNM system), was analyzed. Results: Both RML and pN classifications were independent prognostic factors when considered separately in multivariate analysis (P-values <0.05). Moreover, the proportion of explained variation (PEV) analysis showed that each classification had more prognostic value than other prognostic factors in two models respectively (P-values<0.05). The D-measure for prognostic separation was 1.563 versus 1.383 for RML versus pN. Bootstrap results for the difference of D-measures did not show a significant difference between RML and pN in terms of prognostic power (95% CI, -0.102 to 0.175). Conclusions: RML is an independent prognostic factor for gastric cancer. However, no significant evidence is found to support the hypothesis that RML classification carries more prognostic value than pN classification.
KW - Gastric cancer
KW - Lymph node classification
KW - Lymph node metastasis
KW - Prognosis
KW - Ratio of metastatic lymph nodes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65449166079&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jso.21247
DO - 10.1002/jso.21247
M3 - Article
C2 - 19208438
AN - SCOPUS:65449166079
SN - 0022-4790
VL - 99
SP - 329
EP - 334
JO - Journal of surgical oncology
JF - Journal of surgical oncology
IS - 6
ER -