Prognostic role of detailed colorectal location and tumor molecular features: analyses of 13,101 colorectal cancer patients including 2994 early-onset cases

Tomotaka Ugai, Naohiko Akimoto, Koichiro Haruki, Tabitha A. Harrison, Yin Cao, Conghui Qu, Andrew T. Chan, Peter T. Campbell, Sonja I. Berndt, Daniel D. Buchanan, Amanda J. Cross, Brenda Diergaarde, Steven J. Gallinger, Marc J. Gunter, Sophia Harlid, Akihisa Hidaka, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner, Jenny Chang-Claude, Li HsuMark A. Jenkins, Yi Lin, Roger L. Milne, Victor Moreno, Polly A. Newcomb, Reiko Nishihara, Mireia Obon-Santacana, Rish K. Pai, Lori C. Sakoda, Robert E. Schoen, Martha L. Slattery, Wei Sun, Efrat L. Amitay, Elizabeth Alwers, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Amanda E. Toland, Bethany Van Guelpen, Syed H. Zaidi, John D. Potter, Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt, Marios Giannakis, Mingyang Song, Jonathan A. Nowak, Ulrike Peters, Amanda I. Phipps, Shuji Ogino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


Background: The pathogenic effect of colorectal tumor molecular features may be influenced by several factors, including those related to microbiota, inflammation, metabolism, and epigenetics, which may change along colorectal segments. We hypothesized that the prognostic association of colon cancer location might differ by tumor molecular characteristics. Methods: Utilizing a consortium dataset of 13,101 colorectal cancer cases, including 2994 early-onset cases, we conducted survival analyses of detailed tumor location stratified by statuses of microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and KRAS and BRAF oncogenic mutation. Results: There was a statistically significant trend for better colon cancer-specific survival in relation to tumor location from the cecum to sigmoid colon (Ptrend = 0.002), excluding the rectum. The prognostic association of colon location differed by MSI status (Pinteraction = 0.001). Non-MSI-high tumors exhibited the cecum-to-sigmoid trend for better colon cancer-specific survival [Ptrend < 0.001; multivariable hazard ratio (HR) for the sigmoid colon (vs. cecum), 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70–0.92], whereas MSI-high tumors demonstrated a suggestive cecum-to-sigmoid trend for worse survival (Ptrend = 0.020; the corresponding HR, 2.13; 95% CI 1.15–3.92). The prognostic association of colon tumor location also differed by CIMP status (Pinteraction = 0.003) but not significantly by age, stage, or other features. Furthermore, MSI-high status was a favorable prognostic indicator in all stages. Conclusions: Both detailed colonic location and tumor molecular features need to be accounted for colon cancer prognostication to advance precision medicine. Our study indicates the important role of large-scale studies to robustly examine detailed colonic subsites in molecular oncology research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-245
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Gastroenterology
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 2023


  • Biogeography
  • Epigenetics
  • Mismatch repair
  • Molecular pathological epidemiology
  • Young-onset cancer


Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic role of detailed colorectal location and tumor molecular features: analyses of 13,101 colorectal cancer patients including 2994 early-onset cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this