TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic biomarkers in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving [177Lu]-PSMA-617
AU - Ferdinandus, Justin
AU - Violet, John
AU - Sandhu, Shahneen
AU - Hicks, Rodney J.
AU - Ravi Kumar, Aravind S.
AU - Iravani, Amir
AU - Kong, Grace
AU - Akhurst, Tim
AU - Thang, Sue Ping
AU - Murphy, Declan G.
AU - Williams, Scott
AU - Hofman, Michael S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Purpose: We analysed quantitative biomarkers derived from both baseline whole-body imaging and blood serum to identify prognostic markers in patients treated within the lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen (LuPSMA) phase 2 trial. Methods: PET image analysis was carried out using whole-body segmentation quantifying molecular tumour volume (SUV > 3 threshold for PSMA, SUV > liver+2sd for fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) including SUVmax and SUVmean. For baseline bone scans, EXINI bone scan index (BSI) was used to calculate the percentage of involved bone. Baseline alkaline phosphatase (ALP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), prostate specific antigen (PSA) and PSA doubling time were also used in this analysis. We used univariate cox regression analysis and log-rank comparison with optimised cut-offs to find suitable biomarkers prognostic of overall survival from time of enrolment. Results: This analysis identified FDG-positive tumour volume (FDGvol; HR 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4–4.8), mean intensity of PSMA-avid tumour uptake (PSMAmean; HR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.8–0.98), bone scan index (BSI; HR 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2–4.4), ALP (HR 1.1; 95% CI, 1–1.2) and LDH (HR 1.2; 95% CI, 1–1.5) as biomarkers prognostic of overall survival. Conclusions: In addition to established biomarkers, both FDG and PSMA PET/CT parameters have prognostic significance for survival in men undergoing LuPSMA therapy.
AB - Purpose: We analysed quantitative biomarkers derived from both baseline whole-body imaging and blood serum to identify prognostic markers in patients treated within the lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen (LuPSMA) phase 2 trial. Methods: PET image analysis was carried out using whole-body segmentation quantifying molecular tumour volume (SUV > 3 threshold for PSMA, SUV > liver+2sd for fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) including SUVmax and SUVmean. For baseline bone scans, EXINI bone scan index (BSI) was used to calculate the percentage of involved bone. Baseline alkaline phosphatase (ALP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), prostate specific antigen (PSA) and PSA doubling time were also used in this analysis. We used univariate cox regression analysis and log-rank comparison with optimised cut-offs to find suitable biomarkers prognostic of overall survival from time of enrolment. Results: This analysis identified FDG-positive tumour volume (FDGvol; HR 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4–4.8), mean intensity of PSMA-avid tumour uptake (PSMAmean; HR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.8–0.98), bone scan index (BSI; HR 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2–4.4), ALP (HR 1.1; 95% CI, 1–1.2) and LDH (HR 1.2; 95% CI, 1–1.5) as biomarkers prognostic of overall survival. Conclusions: In addition to established biomarkers, both FDG and PSMA PET/CT parameters have prognostic significance for survival in men undergoing LuPSMA therapy.
KW - FDG
KW - PSMA
KW - Prognostic markers
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Prostate specific membrane antigen
KW - Radioligand therapy
KW - Theranostics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080987384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00259-020-04723-z
DO - 10.1007/s00259-020-04723-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 32140802
AN - SCOPUS:85080987384
SN - 1619-7070
VL - 47
SP - 2322
EP - 2327
JO - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
JF - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
IS - 10
ER -