TY - JOUR
T1 - Process evaluation of a monitoring log system for community coalition activities
T2 - Five-year results and lessons learned
AU - Chalmers, Maria L.
AU - Housemann, Robyn A.
AU - Wiggs, Imogene
AU - Newcomb-Hagood, Laura
AU - Malone, Bernard
AU - Brownson, Ross C.
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - Purpose. Coalitions can be a successful way to promote healthy initiatives throughout a community. To properly measure the success of coalition-based interventions, it is important to conduct a process evaluation of coalition activities and establish a system for evaluating outcomes. This article describes a process evaluation of a monitoring and feedback system for community coalitions targeting chronic disease risk reduction. Methods. Community coalitions in six rural, southeast Missouri counties collaborated with the Missouri Department of Health and Saint Louis University to track coalition events using the process described in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention manual Evaluating Community Efforts to Prevent Cardiovascular Diseases. Summary. First, we describe the methodology used to monitor monthly activities and to evaluate satisfaction with the process. Next, we discuss the data that resulted from the monitoring system and interviews with recorders. Third, we discuss changes made to the monitoring system and lessons learned along the way. Finally, we end with recommendations for incorporating this monitoring system in community practice. Conclusions. When used properly, this system is an effective way of evaluating and promoting sustainability of community interventions.
AB - Purpose. Coalitions can be a successful way to promote healthy initiatives throughout a community. To properly measure the success of coalition-based interventions, it is important to conduct a process evaluation of coalition activities and establish a system for evaluating outcomes. This article describes a process evaluation of a monitoring and feedback system for community coalitions targeting chronic disease risk reduction. Methods. Community coalitions in six rural, southeast Missouri counties collaborated with the Missouri Department of Health and Saint Louis University to track coalition events using the process described in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention manual Evaluating Community Efforts to Prevent Cardiovascular Diseases. Summary. First, we describe the methodology used to monitor monthly activities and to evaluate satisfaction with the process. Next, we discuss the data that resulted from the monitoring system and interviews with recorders. Third, we discuss changes made to the monitoring system and lessons learned along the way. Finally, we end with recommendations for incorporating this monitoring system in community practice. Conclusions. When used properly, this system is an effective way of evaluating and promoting sustainability of community interventions.
KW - Cardiovascular Disease
KW - Community Coalition
KW - Evaluation
KW - Event Logs
KW - Prevention Research
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0037231497
U2 - 10.4278/0890-1171-17.3.190
DO - 10.4278/0890-1171-17.3.190
M3 - Article
C2 - 12545587
AN - SCOPUS:0037231497
SN - 0890-1171
VL - 17
SP - 190
EP - 196
JO - American Journal of Health Promotion
JF - American Journal of Health Promotion
IS - 3
ER -