Probing the signaling requirements for naive human pluripotency by high-throughput chemical screening

Shafqat A. Khan, Kyoung mi Park, Laura A. Fischer, Chen Dong, Tenzin Lungjangwa, Marta Jimenez, Dominick Casalena, Brian Chew, Sabine Dietmann, Douglas S. Auld, Rudolf Jaenisch, Thorold W. Theunissen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Naive human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) have been isolated that more closely resemble the pre-implantation epiblast compared to conventional “primed” hESCs, but the signaling principles underlying these discrete stem cell states remain incompletely understood. Here, we describe the results from a high-throughput screen using ∼3,000 well-annotated compounds to identify essential signaling requirements for naive human pluripotency. We report that MEK1/2 inhibitors can be replaced during maintenance of naive human pluripotency by inhibitors targeting either upstream (FGFR, RAF) or downstream (ERK1/2) kinases. Naive hESCs maintained under these alternative conditions display elevated levels of ERK phosphorylation but retain genome-wide DNA hypomethylation and a transcriptional identity of the pre-implantation epiblast. In contrast, dual inhibition of MEK and ERK promotes efficient primed-to-naive resetting in combination with PKC, ROCK, and TNKS inhibitors and activin A. This work demonstrates that induction and maintenance of naive human pluripotency are governed by distinct signaling requirements.

Original languageEnglish
Article number109233
JournalCell Reports
Volume35
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2021

Keywords

  • DNA methylation
  • FGFR signaling pathway
  • X chromosome reactivation
  • high-throughput screening
  • naive pluripotency
  • pre-implantation development
  • primed pluripotency
  • signal transduction
  • transposable elements
  • trophoblast

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Probing the signaling requirements for naive human pluripotency by high-throughput chemical screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this