TY - JOUR
T1 - Priorities to Promote Participant Engagement in the Participant Engagement and Cancer Genome Sequencing (PE-CGS) Network
AU - the Participant Engagement and Cancer Genome Sequencing (PE-CGS) Network
AU - Schuster, Anne L.R.
AU - Crossnohere, Norah L.
AU - Bachini, Melinda
AU - Blair, Cindy K.
AU - Carpten, John D.
AU - Claus, Elizabeth B.
AU - Colditz, Graham A.
AU - Ding, Li
AU - Drake, Bettina F.
AU - Fields, Ryan C.
AU - Janeway, Katherine A.
AU - Kwan, Bethany M.
AU - Lenz, Heinz Josef
AU - Ma, Qin
AU - Mishra, Shiraz I.
AU - Paskett, Electra D.
AU - Rebbeck, Timothy R.
AU - Ricker, Charité
AU - Stern, Mariana C.
AU - Sussman, Andrew L.
AU - Tiner, Jessica C.
AU - Trent, Jeffrey M.
AU - Verhaak, Roel G.W.
AU - Wagle, Nikhil
AU - Willman, Cheryl
AU - Bridges, John F.P.
AU - Bradbury, Angela R.
AU - Davis, Melissa B.
AU - Freeman-Daily, Janet
AU - Parsons, D. Williams
AU - Segarra-Vazquez, Barbara
AU - Witte, John S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2023/4/1
Y1 - 2023/4/1
N2 - Background: Engaging diverse populations in cancer genomics research is of critical importance and is a fundamental goal of the NCI Participant Engagement and Cancer Genome Sequencing (PE-CGS) Network. Established as part of the Cancer Moonshot, PE-CGS is a consortium of stakeholders including clinicians, scientists, genetic counselors, and representatives of potential study participants and their communities. Participant engagement is an ongoing, bidirectional, and mutually beneficial interaction between study participants and researchers. PE-CGS sought to set priorities in participant engagement for conducting the network's research. Methods: PE-CGS deliberatively engaged its stakeholders in the following four-phase process to set the network's research priorities in participant engagement: (i) a brainstorming exercise to elicit potential priorities; (ii) a 2-day virtual meeting to discuss priorities; (iii) recommendations from the PE-CGS External Advisory Panel to refine priorities; and (iv) a virtual meeting to set priorities. Results: Nearly 150 PE-CGS stakeholders engaged in the process. Five priorities were set: (i) tailor education and communication materials for participants throughout the research process; (ii) identify measures of participant engagement; (iii) identify optimal participant engagement strategies; (iv) understand cancer disparities in the context of cancer genomics research; and (v) personalize the return of genomics findings to participants. Conclusions: PE-CGS is pursuing these priorities to meaningfully engage diverse and underrepresented patients with cancer and posttreatment cancer survivors as participants in cancer genomics research and, subsequently, generate new discoveries. Impact: Data from PE-CGS will be shared with the broader scientific community in a manner consistent with participant informed consent and community agreement.
AB - Background: Engaging diverse populations in cancer genomics research is of critical importance and is a fundamental goal of the NCI Participant Engagement and Cancer Genome Sequencing (PE-CGS) Network. Established as part of the Cancer Moonshot, PE-CGS is a consortium of stakeholders including clinicians, scientists, genetic counselors, and representatives of potential study participants and their communities. Participant engagement is an ongoing, bidirectional, and mutually beneficial interaction between study participants and researchers. PE-CGS sought to set priorities in participant engagement for conducting the network's research. Methods: PE-CGS deliberatively engaged its stakeholders in the following four-phase process to set the network's research priorities in participant engagement: (i) a brainstorming exercise to elicit potential priorities; (ii) a 2-day virtual meeting to discuss priorities; (iii) recommendations from the PE-CGS External Advisory Panel to refine priorities; and (iv) a virtual meeting to set priorities. Results: Nearly 150 PE-CGS stakeholders engaged in the process. Five priorities were set: (i) tailor education and communication materials for participants throughout the research process; (ii) identify measures of participant engagement; (iii) identify optimal participant engagement strategies; (iv) understand cancer disparities in the context of cancer genomics research; and (v) personalize the return of genomics findings to participants. Conclusions: PE-CGS is pursuing these priorities to meaningfully engage diverse and underrepresented patients with cancer and posttreatment cancer survivors as participants in cancer genomics research and, subsequently, generate new discoveries. Impact: Data from PE-CGS will be shared with the broader scientific community in a manner consistent with participant informed consent and community agreement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151575169&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0356
DO - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0356
M3 - Article
C2 - 36791345
AN - SCOPUS:85151575169
SN - 1055-9965
VL - 32
SP - 487
EP - 495
JO - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
JF - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
IS - 4
ER -