Prevention trials: Their place in how we understand the value of prevention strategies

Graham A. Colditz, Philip R. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Several key factors bear on the interpretation of prevention trials and observational studies that inform prevention strategies. These factors include the underlying disease process and aspects of the intervention: sustainability of behavior change, the time course of the intervention within the disease process, dose and duration of exposure needed to effect risk reduction, durability of the impact of intervention, and methodological problems in implementing and interpreting randomized trials and observational studies to evaluate prevention strategies. The question asked through an intent-to-treat analysis of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) differs from that in the observational setting. Furthermore, the long duration necessary to conduct prevention trials and the resulting lack of adherence to therapy can bias results toward the null. A broader range of approaches to evaluate prevention interventions and programs with improved knowledge synthesis and translation to public health practice will speed our progress toward achieving public health and prevention of chronic diseases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-120
Number of pages16
JournalAnnual Review of Public Health
Volume31
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 21 2010

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Behavior modification
  • Bias
  • Drugs
  • Durability
  • Intention-to-treat

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prevention trials: Their place in how we understand the value of prevention strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this