TY - JOUR
T1 - Preoperative Factors That Predict the Need to Morcellate in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
AU - Wolfe, Morgan
AU - Biest, Scott
AU - Tutlam, Nhial
AU - Woolfolk, Candice
AU - Winner, Brooke
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Study Objective To determine which preoperative factors best predict the need for uterine morcellation at the time of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and to identify cut-offs that can help guide clinical decision-making. Design Retrospective cohort (Canadian Task Force classification II). Setting Tertiary care center. Patients Women (n = 420) who underwent TLH between July 2012 and June 2015: 223 cases without and 197 cases with morcellation. Interventions Laparoscopic hysterectomies with either laparoscopic power, vaginal, or open morcellation via mini-laparotomy were analyzed. Measurements and Main Results Preoperative factors assessed included uterine volume, cross-sectional area, length, size of largest leiomyoma, and bimanual exam. Receiver operator curves (ROC) were used to establish cut-offs that maximized sensitivity and specificity for each factor. Bivariate and multivariate Poisson regression analyses were used to calculate relative risks associated with these objective cut-offs. ROC curves demonstrated maximized sensitivities and specificities with a cross-sectional area of 48.6 cm 2 , largest leiomyoma dimension of 4.4 cm, bimanual exam of 11.5 weeks, and uterine volume of 262 mL. Multivariate Poisson regression analysis revealed that the strongest predictors of morcellation were cross-sectional area (adjusted relative risk, 2.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.20–7.19), largest leiomyoma diameter (adjusted relative risk, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.24–3.41), and bimanual exam (adjusted relative risk, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.05–3.37). Conclusion Uterine cross-sectional area, largest leiomyoma dimension, and uterine size on bimanual exam can all be used to predict the need to morcellate at the time of TLH.
AB - Study Objective To determine which preoperative factors best predict the need for uterine morcellation at the time of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and to identify cut-offs that can help guide clinical decision-making. Design Retrospective cohort (Canadian Task Force classification II). Setting Tertiary care center. Patients Women (n = 420) who underwent TLH between July 2012 and June 2015: 223 cases without and 197 cases with morcellation. Interventions Laparoscopic hysterectomies with either laparoscopic power, vaginal, or open morcellation via mini-laparotomy were analyzed. Measurements and Main Results Preoperative factors assessed included uterine volume, cross-sectional area, length, size of largest leiomyoma, and bimanual exam. Receiver operator curves (ROC) were used to establish cut-offs that maximized sensitivity and specificity for each factor. Bivariate and multivariate Poisson regression analyses were used to calculate relative risks associated with these objective cut-offs. ROC curves demonstrated maximized sensitivities and specificities with a cross-sectional area of 48.6 cm 2 , largest leiomyoma dimension of 4.4 cm, bimanual exam of 11.5 weeks, and uterine volume of 262 mL. Multivariate Poisson regression analysis revealed that the strongest predictors of morcellation were cross-sectional area (adjusted relative risk, 2.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.20–7.19), largest leiomyoma diameter (adjusted relative risk, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.24–3.41), and bimanual exam (adjusted relative risk, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.05–3.37). Conclusion Uterine cross-sectional area, largest leiomyoma dimension, and uterine size on bimanual exam can all be used to predict the need to morcellate at the time of TLH.
KW - Laparoscopic hysterectomy
KW - Morcellation
KW - Preoperative factors
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85040177483
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.09.015
DO - 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.09.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 28943192
AN - SCOPUS:85040177483
SN - 1553-4650
VL - 25
SP - 158
EP - 162
JO - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
JF - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
IS - 1
ER -