Preferences of adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease for attributes of clinical trials: Evidence from a choice-based conjoint analysis

Dallas Wood, Katherine Kosa, Derek Brown, Orna G. Ehrlich, Peter D.R. Higgins, Caren Heller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Clinical trial recruitment is the rate-limiting step in developing new treatments. To understand inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patient recruitment, we investigated two questions: Do changes in clinical trial attributes, like monetary compensation, influence recruitment rates, and does this influence differ across subgroups? Methods: We answered these questions through a conjoint survey of 949 adult IBD patients. Results: Recruitment rates are influenced by trial attributes: small but significant increases are predicted with lower placebo rates, reduced number of endoscopies, less time commitment, open label extension, and increased involvement of participant's primary GI physician. A much stronger effect was found with increased monetary compensation. Latent class analysis indicated three patient subgroups: some patients quite willing to participate in IBD trials, some quite reluctant, and others who can be persuaded. The persuadable group is quite sensitive to monetary compensation, and payments up to US$2,000 for a 1-year study could significantly increase recruitment rates for IBD clinical trials. Conclusions: This innovative study provides researchers with a framework for predicting recruitment rates for different IBD clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCrohn's and Colitis 360
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020

Keywords

  • Clinical trials
  • Conjoint analysis
  • Crohn's disease
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Patient recruitment
  • Ulcerative colitis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Preferences of adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease for attributes of clinical trials: Evidence from a choice-based conjoint analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this