Preference to Age in Place in Low-Income Senior Housing

Low-income senior housing provided through the Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly program is a critical site for aging in place, and many of these properties have hired service coordinators to monitor residents’ quality of life, provide access to services, and promote their ability to age in place. To address gaps in the limited literature on Section 202 buildings, this study examined the association between service coordination and low-income senior housing residents’ preference to age in place with particular attention to the most economically vulnerable. We analyzed data from 255 older adults living in eight Section 202 buildings in Southeastern Michigan using logistic regression. Self-perceived economic vulnerability moderated the relationship between service coordination and preference to age in place. Among those who had not received service coordination, the high economic vulnerability group was more likely to prefer to age in place compared to more economically secure residents. Among those who received assistance from a service coordinator, economically vulnerable residents were less likely to express a preference to age in place compared to other residents. Findings indicate a complex relationship between service coordination, economic resources, and preference to age in place in senior housing, and suggest areas for future research.