TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of recurrent clostridium difficile infection using comprehensive electronic medical records in an integrated healthcare delivery system
AU - Escobar, Gabriel J.
AU - Baker, Jennifer M.
AU - Kipnis, Patricia
AU - Greene, John D.
AU - Mast, T. Christopher
AU - Gupta, Swati B.
AU - Cossrow, Nicole
AU - Mehta, Vinay
AU - Liu, Vincent
AU - Dubberke, Erik R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - BACKGROUND Predicting recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI) remains difficult. METHODS. We employed a retrospective cohort design. Granular electronic medical record (EMR) data had been collected from patients hospitalized at 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospitals. The derivation dataset (2007-2013) included data from 9,386 patients who experienced incident CDI (iCDI) and 1,311 who experienced their first CDI recurrences (rCDI). The validation dataset (2014) included data from 1,865 patients who experienced incident CDI and 144 who experienced rCDI. Using multiple techniques, including machine learning, we evaluated more than 150 potential predictors. Our final analyses evaluated 3 models with varying degrees of complexity and 1 previously published model. RESULTS Despite having a large multicenter cohort and access to granular EMR data (eg, vital signs, and laboratory test results), none of the models discriminated well (c statistics, 0.591-0.605), had good calibration, or had good explanatory power. CONCLUSIONS Our ability to predict rCDI remains limited. Given currently available EMR technology, improvements in prediction will require incorporating new variables because currently available data elements lack adequate explanatory power. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1196-1203.
AB - BACKGROUND Predicting recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI) remains difficult. METHODS. We employed a retrospective cohort design. Granular electronic medical record (EMR) data had been collected from patients hospitalized at 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospitals. The derivation dataset (2007-2013) included data from 9,386 patients who experienced incident CDI (iCDI) and 1,311 who experienced their first CDI recurrences (rCDI). The validation dataset (2014) included data from 1,865 patients who experienced incident CDI and 144 who experienced rCDI. Using multiple techniques, including machine learning, we evaluated more than 150 potential predictors. Our final analyses evaluated 3 models with varying degrees of complexity and 1 previously published model. RESULTS Despite having a large multicenter cohort and access to granular EMR data (eg, vital signs, and laboratory test results), none of the models discriminated well (c statistics, 0.591-0.605), had good calibration, or had good explanatory power. CONCLUSIONS Our ability to predict rCDI remains limited. Given currently available EMR technology, improvements in prediction will require incorporating new variables because currently available data elements lack adequate explanatory power. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1196-1203.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85029857162
U2 - 10.1017/ice.2017.176
DO - 10.1017/ice.2017.176
M3 - Article
C2 - 28835289
AN - SCOPUS:85029857162
SN - 0899-823X
VL - 38
SP - 1196
EP - 1203
JO - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
JF - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
IS - 10
ER -