TY - JOUR
T1 - Pre-post implementation study of a medication-focused order set for management of acute agitation in a pediatric emergency department
AU - Mills, Kimberly P.
AU - Kemper, Megan
AU - Hoganson, George M.
AU - Charatcharungkiat, Natchanan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2025. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected]. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)
PY - 2026/6/1
Y1 - 2026/6/1
N2 - Purpose: To assess changes in prescribing practice after implementation of a medication-focused order set for acute agitation management in a pediatric emergency department (ED). Methods: Patients 5 to 18 years of age who presented to the St. Louis Children’s Hospital ED for behavioral health concerns between September 1, 2020, and October 31, 2022, were included. Chlorpromazine, clonidine, diphenhydramine, haloperidol, lorazepam, olanzapine, and/or risperidone administrations, including dose, route, frequency, and automated dispensing cabinet (ADC) overrides, were evaluated per ED patient encounter. Physical restraint orders were also assessed. Results: We identified 3,756 patient encounters; 1,742 were included in the preimplementation group and 2,014 in the postimplementation group. The proportion of ED encounters with medication administration and the number of medications administered per encounter did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. There was an increase in the frequency of ED patient encounters with olanzapine and chlorpromazine administration after order set implementation, whereas haloperidol and lorazepam administration decreased. The percentage of patient encounters with standing pro re nata medications orders increased in the postimplementation period, while there were decreases in ADC overrides, combination therapy administration, and duration of physical restraint use per ED encounter. Conclusion: Prescribing practices, including medication selection, ordered frequency, ADC overrides, and combination therapy, differed following the implementation of a medication-focused order set for acute agitation. Transitioning to empiric oral and intramuscular olanzapine as first-line therapy, diphenhydramine as second-line therapy, and olanzapine as third-line therapy did not increase the rate of medication administration or utilization of subsequent lines of therapy. Additional studies are needed to better understand individualized response, adverse effects, and the incidence of oversedation with pharmacotherapy for acute agitation management in pediatric patients in the ED setting.
AB - Purpose: To assess changes in prescribing practice after implementation of a medication-focused order set for acute agitation management in a pediatric emergency department (ED). Methods: Patients 5 to 18 years of age who presented to the St. Louis Children’s Hospital ED for behavioral health concerns between September 1, 2020, and October 31, 2022, were included. Chlorpromazine, clonidine, diphenhydramine, haloperidol, lorazepam, olanzapine, and/or risperidone administrations, including dose, route, frequency, and automated dispensing cabinet (ADC) overrides, were evaluated per ED patient encounter. Physical restraint orders were also assessed. Results: We identified 3,756 patient encounters; 1,742 were included in the preimplementation group and 2,014 in the postimplementation group. The proportion of ED encounters with medication administration and the number of medications administered per encounter did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. There was an increase in the frequency of ED patient encounters with olanzapine and chlorpromazine administration after order set implementation, whereas haloperidol and lorazepam administration decreased. The percentage of patient encounters with standing pro re nata medications orders increased in the postimplementation period, while there were decreases in ADC overrides, combination therapy administration, and duration of physical restraint use per ED encounter. Conclusion: Prescribing practices, including medication selection, ordered frequency, ADC overrides, and combination therapy, differed following the implementation of a medication-focused order set for acute agitation. Transitioning to empiric oral and intramuscular olanzapine as first-line therapy, diphenhydramine as second-line therapy, and olanzapine as third-line therapy did not increase the rate of medication administration or utilization of subsequent lines of therapy. Additional studies are needed to better understand individualized response, adverse effects, and the incidence of oversedation with pharmacotherapy for acute agitation management in pediatric patients in the ED setting.
KW - behavioral health
KW - emergency department
KW - emergency psychiatry
KW - mental health
KW - olanzapine
KW - pediatric agitation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105040036427
U2 - 10.1093/ajhp/zxaf117
DO - 10.1093/ajhp/zxaf117
M3 - Article
C2 - 40576965
AN - SCOPUS:105040036427
SN - 1079-2082
VL - 83
SP - e390-e399
JO - American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
JF - American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
IS - 11
ER -