Prawns and probability

  • Richard P. Mann
  • , Andrea Perna
  • , Daniel Strömbom
  • , David J.T. Sumpter
  • , Roman Garnett
  • , James E. Herbert-Read
  • , Ashley J.W. Ward

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

We will deonstrate the use of (more or less!) Bayesian methods for inferring interaction rules between individuals in a system of collective animal motion. We examine a group of prawns moving in an effectively one-dimensional environment, which we reduce to a binary classification problem, aiming to infer the factors that predict whether an individual will change its direction of motion. Our results show that interactions are primarily driven by spatial proximity, that prawns tend to align with other individuals travelling in the opposite direction and that the effect of interactions persist over time to create a non-Markovian system. This extended introduction provides technical details of the models we examine and some preliminary findings. The full results of this analysis will be published when complete.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering - 31st International Workshop on Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering, MaxEnt 2011
Pages362-365
Number of pages4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
Event31st International Workshop on Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering, MaxEnt 2011 - Waterloo, ON, Canada
Duration: Jul 9 2011Jul 16 2011

Publication series

NameAIP Conference Proceedings
Volume1443
ISSN (Print)0094-243X
ISSN (Electronic)1551-7616

Conference

Conference31st International Workshop on Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering, MaxEnt 2011
Country/TerritoryCanada
CityWaterloo, ON
Period07/9/1107/16/11

Keywords

  • Animal Behaviour
  • Collective Behaviour
  • Complex Systems
  • Prawns

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prawns and probability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this