Postoperative Discharge to Acute Rehabilitation or Skilled Nursing Facility Compared With Home Does Not Reduce Hospital Readmissions, Return to Surgery, or Improve Outcomes Following Adult Spine Deformity Surgery

International Spine Study Group, Shay Bess, Breton G. Line, Pierce Nunley, Christopher Ames, Douglas Burton, Gregory Mundis, Robert Eastlack, Robert Hart, Munish Gupta, Eric Klineberg, Han Jo Kim, Michael Kelly, Richard Hostin, Khaled Kebaish, Virgine Lafage, Renaud Lafage, Frank Schwab, Christopher Shaffrey, Justin S. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study Design. Retrospective review of a prospective multicenter adult spinal deformity (ASD) study. Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate 30-day readmissions, 90-day return to surgery, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for matched ASD patients receiving nonhome discharge (NON), including acute rehabilitation (REHAB), and skilled nursing facility (SNF), or home (HOME) discharge following ASD surgery. Summary of Background Data. Postoperative disposition following ASD surgery frequently involves nonhome discharge. Little data exists for longer term outcomes for ASD patients receiving nonhome discharge versus patients discharged to home. Materials and Methods. Surgically treated ASD patients prospectively enrolled into a multicenter study were assessed for NON or HOME disposition following hospital discharge. NON was further divided into REHAB or SNF. Propensity score matching was used to match for patient age, frailty, spine deformity, levels fused, and osteotomies performed at surgery. Thirty-day hospital readmissions, 90-day return to surgery, postoperative complications, and 1-year and minimum 2-year postoperative PROs were evaluated. Results. A total of 241 of 374 patients were eligible for the study. NON patients were identified and matched to HOME patients. Following matching, 158 patients remained for evaluation; NON and HOME had similar preoperative age, frailty, spine deformity magnitude, surgery performed, and duration of hospital stay (P > 0.05). Thirty-day readmissions, 90-day return to surgery, and postoperative complications were similar for NON versus HOME and similar for REHAB (N = 64) versus SNF (N = 42) versus HOME (P > 0.05). At 1-year and minimum 2-year follow-up, HOME demonstrated similar to better PRO scores including Oswestry Disability Index, Short-Form 36v2 questionnaire Mental Component Score and Physical Component Score, and Scoliosis Research Society scores versus NON, REHAB, and SNF (P < 0.05). Conclusions. Acute needs must be considered following ASD surgery, however, matched analysis comparing 30-day hospital readmissions, 90-day return to surgery, postoperative complications, and PROs demonstrated minimal benefit for NON, REHAB, or SNF versus HOME at 1- and 2-year follow-up, questioning the risk and cost/benefits of routine use of nonhome discharge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E117-E127
JournalSpine
Volume49
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2024

Keywords

  • adult spinal deformity
  • complications
  • discharge disposition
  • patient-reported outcome measures
  • rehabilitation
  • skilled nursing facility

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Postoperative Discharge to Acute Rehabilitation or Skilled Nursing Facility Compared With Home Does Not Reduce Hospital Readmissions, Return to Surgery, or Improve Outcomes Following Adult Spine Deformity Surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this