Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance

  • Andrew P. Knight
  • , Noah Eisenkraft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

184 Scopus citations

Abstract

Grounded in a social functional perspective, this article examines the conditions under which group affect influences group functioning. Using meta-analysis, the authors leverage heterogeneity across 39 independent studies of 2,799 groups to understand how contextual factors- group affect source (exogenous or endogenous to the group) and group life span (one-shot or ongoing)-moderate the influence of shared feelings on social integration and task performance. As predicted, results indicate that group positive affect has consistent positive effects on social integration and task performance regardless of contextual idiosyncrasies. The effects of group negative affect, on the other hand, are context-dependent. Shared negative feelings promote social integration and task performance when stemming from an exogenous source or experienced in a 1-shot group, but undermine social integration and task performance when stemming from an endogenous source or experienced in an ongoing group. The authors discuss implications of their findings and highlight directions for future theory and research on group affect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1214-1227
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume100
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Keywords

  • Affect
  • Group
  • Meta-analysis
  • Social integration
  • Team

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this