TY - JOUR
T1 - Positive end-expiratory pressure prevents the loss of respiratory compliance during low tidal volume ventilation in acute lung injury patients
AU - Cereda, Maurizio
AU - Foti, Giuseppe
AU - Musch, Guido
AU - Sparacino, Maria Elena
AU - Pesenti, Antonio
PY - 1996/1/1
Y1 - 1996/1/1
N2 - Study objective: To study the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the decay of respiratory system compliance (Cpl,rs) due to low tidal volume (VT) ventilation in acute lung injury (ALI) patients. Setting: General ICU in a university hospital. Participants: Eight ALI patients with a lung injury score greater than 2.5. Interventions: Pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), with an average VT of 8.5±0.4 mL/kg, were applied at three levels of PEEP (5, 10, and 15 cm H2O). Before each PCV and VCV period, lung volume history was standardized by manual hyperinflation maneuvers. Measurements: We measured Cpl,rs at time 0 (start), 10, 20, and 30 (end) min from the beginning of each PCV and VCV period. Gas exchange and hemodynamic data were collected at end. Results: At PEEP 5 and 10 cm H2O, we observed a progressive Cpl,rs decay with both PCV and VCV modes. At PEEP 5 cm H2O, we detected a higher Cpl,rs decrease during PCV, due to a higher Cpl,rs at start, compared with VCV. At PEEP 15 cm H2O, Cpl,rs did not decrease significantly. Cpl,rs values measured at end as well as oxygenation and hemodynamic data did not differ between PCV and VCV. At PEEP 15 cm H2O, PCV provided lower PaCO2 than VCV. Conclusions: A PEEP of at least 15 cm H2O was needed to prevent Cpl,rs decay. The progressive Cpl,rs loss we observed at lower PEEP probably reflects alveolar instability.
AB - Study objective: To study the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the decay of respiratory system compliance (Cpl,rs) due to low tidal volume (VT) ventilation in acute lung injury (ALI) patients. Setting: General ICU in a university hospital. Participants: Eight ALI patients with a lung injury score greater than 2.5. Interventions: Pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), with an average VT of 8.5±0.4 mL/kg, were applied at three levels of PEEP (5, 10, and 15 cm H2O). Before each PCV and VCV period, lung volume history was standardized by manual hyperinflation maneuvers. Measurements: We measured Cpl,rs at time 0 (start), 10, 20, and 30 (end) min from the beginning of each PCV and VCV period. Gas exchange and hemodynamic data were collected at end. Results: At PEEP 5 and 10 cm H2O, we observed a progressive Cpl,rs decay with both PCV and VCV modes. At PEEP 5 cm H2O, we detected a higher Cpl,rs decrease during PCV, due to a higher Cpl,rs at start, compared with VCV. At PEEP 15 cm H2O, Cpl,rs did not decrease significantly. Cpl,rs values measured at end as well as oxygenation and hemodynamic data did not differ between PCV and VCV. At PEEP 15 cm H2O, PCV provided lower PaCO2 than VCV. Conclusions: A PEEP of at least 15 cm H2O was needed to prevent Cpl,rs decay. The progressive Cpl,rs loss we observed at lower PEEP probably reflects alveolar instability.
KW - acute lung injury
KW - mechanical ventilation
KW - positive end-expiratory pressure
KW - respiratory mechanics
KW - respiratory system compliance
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0030044748
U2 - 10.1378/chest.109.2.480
DO - 10.1378/chest.109.2.480
M3 - Article
C2 - 8620726
AN - SCOPUS:0030044748
SN - 0012-3692
VL - 109
SP - 480
EP - 485
JO - CHEST
JF - CHEST
IS - 2
ER -