Political psychophysiology

  • Jaime E. Settle
  • , Matthew V. Hibbing
  • , Nicolas M. Anspach
  • , Taylor N. Carlson
  • , Chelsea M. Coe
  • , Edward Hernandez
  • , John Peterson
  • , John Stuart
  • , Kevin Arceneaux

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    14 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    The past decade has seen a rapid increase in the number of studies employing psychophysiological methods to explain variation in political attitudes and behavior. However, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of physiological data present novel challenges for political scientists unfamiliar with the underlying biological concepts and technical skills necessary for utilizing this approach. Our objective in this article is to maximize the effectiveness of future work utilizing psychophysiological measurement by providing guidance on how the techniques can be employed most fruitfully as a complement to, not a replacement for, existing methods. We develop clear, step-by-step instructions for how physiological research should be conducted and provide a discussion of the issues commonly faced by scholars working with these measures. Our hope is that this article will be a useful resource for both neophytes and experienced scholars in lowering the start-up costs to doing this work and assessing it as part of the peer review process. More broadly, in the spirit of the open science framework, we aim to foster increased communication, collaboration, and replication of findings across political science labs utilizing psychophysiological methods.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)101-117
    Number of pages17
    JournalPolitics and the Life Sciences
    Volume39
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Mar 1 2020

    Keywords

    • Psychophysiology
    • Research Tool Report
    • Skin conductance

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Political psychophysiology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this