Abstract

Scientists are under increasing pressure to do "novel" research. Here I explore whether there are risks to overemphasizing novelty when deciding what constitutes good science. I review studies from the philosophy of science to help understand how important an explicit emphasis on novelty might be for scientific progress. I also review studies from the sociology of science to anticipate how emphasizing novelty might impact the structure and function of the scientific community. I conclude that placing too much value on novelty could have counterproductive effects on both the rate of progress in science and the organization of the scientific community. I finish by recommending that our current emphasis on novelty be replaced by a renewed emphasis on predictive power as a characteristic of good science.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere28699
JournaleLife
Volume6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 25 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Point of View: How should novelty be valued in science?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this