Point-counterpoint: should sedation be used for image-guided biopsies?

Andrew W. Bowman; Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner; Malak Itani; Olga R. Brook; Constantine M. Burgan

doi:10.1007/s00261-024-04649-2

Point-counterpoint: should sedation be used for image-guided biopsies?

Andrew W. Bowman
, Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner
, Malak Itani
, Olga R. Brook
, Constantine M. Burgan

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Cross-sectional interventional radiology procedures can be performed using a range of techniques with approaches varying across institutions. One area in which practices for these procedures may differ is in the use of moderate sedation. This perspective discusses the pros and cons of using moderate sedation for deep organ biopsies commonly experienced in radiology departments.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	4389-4394
Number of pages	6
Journal	Abdominal Radiology
Volume	50
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04649-2
State	Published - Sep 2025

Keywords

Biopsy
Cross-sectional interventional radiology
Sedation

Access to Document

10.1007/s00261-024-04649-2

Cite this

@article{1739f4a87b0640f0a1a22dca490209da,

title = "Point-counterpoint: should sedation be used for image-guided biopsies?",

abstract = "Cross-sectional interventional radiology procedures can be performed using a range of techniques with approaches varying across institutions. One area in which practices for these procedures may differ is in the use of moderate sedation. This perspective discusses the pros and cons of using moderate sedation for deep organ biopsies commonly experienced in radiology departments.",

keywords = "Biopsy, Cross-sectional interventional radiology, Sedation",

author = "\{W. Bowman\}, Andrew and Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner and Malak Itani and \{R. Brook\}, Olga and \{M. Burgan\}, Constantine",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.",

year = "2025",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1007/s00261-024-04649-2",

language = "English",

volume = "50",

pages = "4389--4394",

journal = "Abdominal Radiology",

issn = "2366-004X",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Point-counterpoint

T2 - should sedation be used for image-guided biopsies?

AU - W. Bowman, Andrew

AU - Wildman-Tobriner, Benjamin

AU - Itani, Malak

AU - R. Brook, Olga

AU - M. Burgan, Constantine

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.

PY - 2025/9

Y1 - 2025/9

N2 - Cross-sectional interventional radiology procedures can be performed using a range of techniques with approaches varying across institutions. One area in which practices for these procedures may differ is in the use of moderate sedation. This perspective discusses the pros and cons of using moderate sedation for deep organ biopsies commonly experienced in radiology departments.

AB - Cross-sectional interventional radiology procedures can be performed using a range of techniques with approaches varying across institutions. One area in which practices for these procedures may differ is in the use of moderate sedation. This perspective discusses the pros and cons of using moderate sedation for deep organ biopsies commonly experienced in radiology departments.

KW - Biopsy

KW - Cross-sectional interventional radiology

KW - Sedation

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85217215248

U2 - 10.1007/s00261-024-04649-2

DO - 10.1007/s00261-024-04649-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 39883166

AN - SCOPUS:85217215248

SN - 2366-004X

VL - 50

SP - 4389

EP - 4394

JO - Abdominal Radiology

JF - Abdominal Radiology

IS - 9

ER -

Point-counterpoint: should sedation be used for image-guided biopsies?

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this