TY - JOUR
T1 - ‘‘Please help me see the dragon I am slaying’’ implementation of a novel patient-pathologist consultation program and survey of patient experience
AU - Booth, Adam L.
AU - Katz, Matthew S.
AU - Misialek, Michael J.
AU - Allen, Timothy Craig
AU - Joseph, Lija
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Context.—Pathologists evaluate human disease and teach medical students, residents, and clinicians. Historically recognized as the ‘‘doctor’s doctor,’’ pathologists are well suited to be a direct patient resource of individualized, accurate information. Objective.—To develop and implement a pathology consultation service whereby patients review their tissue slides directly with pathologists. Design.—A pathologist conducted patient consultations, reviewing biopsy or surgery findings on a multiheaded microscope or computer screen. The pathologist evaluated patients’ understanding of their disease and invited patients to ask specific questions. We recorded patient demographic data and assessed utilization with a short patient satisfaction survey using 6 questions with a 5-point Likert scale and 2 questions for open response. Results.—A total of 31 patients came for consultation; 39% (12 of 31) were accompanied by a friend or family member. Patients’ median age was 59 years, with a strong female predominance (90%; 28 of 31). The majority of patients had breast cancer (58%; 18 of 31) or hematologic malignancy (19%; 6 of 31). Of the 31 patients, the survey response rate was 58% (18 of 31). Top-box scoring demonstrated program support, with 89% (16 of 18) of respondents strongly recommending the experience to another patient. Additionally, 78% (14 of 18) strongly agreed that they felt more empowered after seeing their disease. Mean scores for Likert-based questions all were higher than 4.0. Conclusions.—To our knowledge, this study is the first report of direct patient-pathologist consultation. Early data suggest that the program may provide effective patient-specific education. The high response rate and favorable assessment of the program suggest that it may be a valuable resource for some patients.
AB - Context.—Pathologists evaluate human disease and teach medical students, residents, and clinicians. Historically recognized as the ‘‘doctor’s doctor,’’ pathologists are well suited to be a direct patient resource of individualized, accurate information. Objective.—To develop and implement a pathology consultation service whereby patients review their tissue slides directly with pathologists. Design.—A pathologist conducted patient consultations, reviewing biopsy or surgery findings on a multiheaded microscope or computer screen. The pathologist evaluated patients’ understanding of their disease and invited patients to ask specific questions. We recorded patient demographic data and assessed utilization with a short patient satisfaction survey using 6 questions with a 5-point Likert scale and 2 questions for open response. Results.—A total of 31 patients came for consultation; 39% (12 of 31) were accompanied by a friend or family member. Patients’ median age was 59 years, with a strong female predominance (90%; 28 of 31). The majority of patients had breast cancer (58%; 18 of 31) or hematologic malignancy (19%; 6 of 31). Of the 31 patients, the survey response rate was 58% (18 of 31). Top-box scoring demonstrated program support, with 89% (16 of 18) of respondents strongly recommending the experience to another patient. Additionally, 78% (14 of 18) strongly agreed that they felt more empowered after seeing their disease. Mean scores for Likert-based questions all were higher than 4.0. Conclusions.—To our knowledge, this study is the first report of direct patient-pathologist consultation. Early data suggest that the program may provide effective patient-specific education. The high response rate and favorable assessment of the program suggest that it may be a valuable resource for some patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068562021&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5858/arpa.2018-0379-OA
DO - 10.5858/arpa.2018-0379-OA
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30398913
AN - SCOPUS:85068562021
SN - 0003-9985
VL - 143
SP - 852
EP - 858
JO - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
JF - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
IS - 7
ER -