TY - JOUR
T1 - Plant functional traits shape the provision of ecosystem services to Indigenous communities in western Amazonia
AU - de Aledo, Julia G.
AU - ter Steege, Hans
AU - Cayuela, Luis
AU - Matas-Granados, Laura
AU - Ben Saadi, Celina
AU - Salinas, Norma
AU - La Torre-Cuadros, María de los Ángeles
AU - Báez, Selene
AU - Bañares-de-Dios, Guillermo
AU - Cayola, Leslie
AU - Fadrique, Belén
AU - Farfán-Rios, William
AU - Fuentes, Alfredo
AU - Homeier, Jürgen
AU - Jadán, Oswaldo
AU - Tello, J. Sebastián
AU - Macía, Manuel J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). People and Nature published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Context. Exploring how Indigenous People interact with plants through their functional traits allows us to understand the ecological bases of plant selection. Functional traits can help explain why certain plants are consistently chosen for specific purposes across diverse cultural contexts. However, these relationships are complex and remain insufficiently explored. Here, we ask (1) which functional traits are most important in shaping different uses? and (2) do similarities in trait–use associations across Indigenous communities reflect patterns of knowledge convergence? Methods. We conducted fieldwork across nine different Indigenous communities spanning a 1800 km distance in western Amazonia. In total, we sampled 115 0.1-ha plots, recording the abundance of 1856 woody plant species. For these species, we collected data on 13 different functional traits, primarily measured in the field, with additional values sourced from TRY and other databases, and conducted in situ ethnobotanical interviews with 25 Indigenous male participants, focusing on 14 distinct use categories. We analysed (1) trait–use relationships using generalized linear models and (2) the similarity in trait selection for each use across communities using generalized linear mixed models. Results. Plants used for medicine or food were associated with multiple traits, including reproductive traits, exudates and life form. In contrast, culturally specific uses such as rituals, cosmetics or recreational were linked to more specific traits, particularly wood density and lianas. Across communities, we observed widespread convergence in trait–use associations, suggesting shared patterns of plant use despite cultural differences. However, 24% of the trait–use combinations showed divergence, indicating local adaptation or cultural specificity. Synthesis and applications. Plant selection by Indigenous communities is not random; rather, it is guided by functional traits that consistently support human well-being. We named this pattern ‘functional selection convergence’, highlighting how ecological function and traditional knowledge interact across distinct cultural contexts. This convergence shows the importance of functional ecology explaining traditional plant selection. Our findings are a call for a trait-based ethnobotanical approach to document and better preserve the ecosystem services essential to Indigenous livelihoods. Nevertheless, we emphasize the need for future research to involve broader and more diverse ethnobotanical participation. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
AB - Context. Exploring how Indigenous People interact with plants through their functional traits allows us to understand the ecological bases of plant selection. Functional traits can help explain why certain plants are consistently chosen for specific purposes across diverse cultural contexts. However, these relationships are complex and remain insufficiently explored. Here, we ask (1) which functional traits are most important in shaping different uses? and (2) do similarities in trait–use associations across Indigenous communities reflect patterns of knowledge convergence? Methods. We conducted fieldwork across nine different Indigenous communities spanning a 1800 km distance in western Amazonia. In total, we sampled 115 0.1-ha plots, recording the abundance of 1856 woody plant species. For these species, we collected data on 13 different functional traits, primarily measured in the field, with additional values sourced from TRY and other databases, and conducted in situ ethnobotanical interviews with 25 Indigenous male participants, focusing on 14 distinct use categories. We analysed (1) trait–use relationships using generalized linear models and (2) the similarity in trait selection for each use across communities using generalized linear mixed models. Results. Plants used for medicine or food were associated with multiple traits, including reproductive traits, exudates and life form. In contrast, culturally specific uses such as rituals, cosmetics or recreational were linked to more specific traits, particularly wood density and lianas. Across communities, we observed widespread convergence in trait–use associations, suggesting shared patterns of plant use despite cultural differences. However, 24% of the trait–use combinations showed divergence, indicating local adaptation or cultural specificity. Synthesis and applications. Plant selection by Indigenous communities is not random; rather, it is guided by functional traits that consistently support human well-being. We named this pattern ‘functional selection convergence’, highlighting how ecological function and traditional knowledge interact across distinct cultural contexts. This convergence shows the importance of functional ecology explaining traditional plant selection. Our findings are a call for a trait-based ethnobotanical approach to document and better preserve the ecosystem services essential to Indigenous livelihoods. Nevertheless, we emphasize the need for future research to involve broader and more diverse ethnobotanical participation. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
KW - Indigenous Peoples
KW - biocultural conservation
KW - ethnobotany
KW - functional ecology
KW - knowledge convergence
KW - medicinal services
KW - plant–human interaction
KW - traditional ecological knowledge
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020597640
U2 - 10.1002/pan3.70191
DO - 10.1002/pan3.70191
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105020597640
SN - 2575-8314
VL - 7
SP - 3313
EP - 3329
JO - People and Nature
JF - People and Nature
IS - 12
ER -