TY - JOUR
T1 - Placement of intracranial pressure monitors by neurointensivists
T2 - Case series and a systematic review
AU - Sadaka, Farid
AU - Kasal, Jan
AU - Lakshmanan, Rekha
AU - Palagiri, Ashok
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Primary objective: Placement of an intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor to guide the management of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been historically performed by neurosurgeons. It is hypothesized that ICP monitors can be placed by non-surgeon neurointensivists, with placement success and complication rates comparable to neurosurgeons. Research design: Retrospective review and systematic review of the literature. Methods and procedures: This study reviewed the medical records of patients with TBI who required insertion of parenchymal ICP monitors performed by four neurointensivists in a large level I trauma centre. Patient data recorded were age, gender, CT findings, ICP monitor placement, location and length of placement, complications related to the ICP monitor and patient outcomes. Main outcomes and results: Thirty-eight (38) monitors (Camino) were placed. Patients' average age was 43.0 years (SD = 21.6); 76% were males. The location of monitor was right frontal in 89% and left frontal in 11%. Mean ICP was 24 (SD = 15), duration of ICP monitor was 4.9 days (SD = 3.6). All monitors were placed successfully. There were no major technical complications, no episodes of major catheter-induced intracranial haemorrhage and no infectious complications. These findings were comparable to published outcomes from neurosurgeon placements. Conclusions: It is believed that insertion of ICP monitors by neurointensivists is safe and may aid in providing prompt monitoring of patients with severe TBI.
AB - Primary objective: Placement of an intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor to guide the management of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been historically performed by neurosurgeons. It is hypothesized that ICP monitors can be placed by non-surgeon neurointensivists, with placement success and complication rates comparable to neurosurgeons. Research design: Retrospective review and systematic review of the literature. Methods and procedures: This study reviewed the medical records of patients with TBI who required insertion of parenchymal ICP monitors performed by four neurointensivists in a large level I trauma centre. Patient data recorded were age, gender, CT findings, ICP monitor placement, location and length of placement, complications related to the ICP monitor and patient outcomes. Main outcomes and results: Thirty-eight (38) monitors (Camino) were placed. Patients' average age was 43.0 years (SD = 21.6); 76% were males. The location of monitor was right frontal in 89% and left frontal in 11%. Mean ICP was 24 (SD = 15), duration of ICP monitor was 4.9 days (SD = 3.6). All monitors were placed successfully. There were no major technical complications, no episodes of major catheter-induced intracranial haemorrhage and no infectious complications. These findings were comparable to published outcomes from neurosurgeon placements. Conclusions: It is believed that insertion of ICP monitors by neurointensivists is safe and may aid in providing prompt monitoring of patients with severe TBI.
KW - Coma
KW - ICP
KW - ICP monitor
KW - Intracranial pressure monitor
KW - Neurointensivist
KW - TBI
KW - Traumatic brain injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876274676&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/02699052.2013.772238
DO - 10.3109/02699052.2013.772238
M3 - Review article
C2 - 23473439
AN - SCOPUS:84876274676
SN - 0269-9052
VL - 27
SP - 600
EP - 604
JO - Brain Injury
JF - Brain Injury
IS - 5
ER -