@article{414c293cfddb47378a1d71dedfd6a725,
title = "Physician-scientists in the United States at 2020: Trends and concerns",
abstract = "Physician-scientists comprise a unique and valuable part of the biomedical workforce, but for decades there has been concern about the number of physicians actively engaged in research. Reports have outlined the challenges facing physician-scientists, and programs have been initiated to encourage and facilitate research careers for medically trained scientists. Many of these initiatives have demonstrated successful outcomes, but there has not been a recent summary of the impact of the past decade of effort. This report compiles available data from surveys of medical education and physician research participation to assess changes in the physician-scientist workforce from 2011–2020. Several trends are positive: rising enrollments in MD-PhD programs, greater levels of interest in research careers among matriculating medical students, more research experience during medical school and rising numbers of physicians in academic medicine, and an increase in first R01 grants to physician-scientists. However, there are now decreased levels of interest in research careers among graduating medical students, a steady decline in MDs applying for NIH loan repayment program support, an increased age at first R01 grant success for physicians, and fewer physicians reporting research as their primary work activity: all of these indicators create concern for the stability of the career path. Despite a recommendation by the Physician-Scientist Workforce in 2014 to create “real-time” reporting on NIH grants and grantees to help the public assess trends, this initiative has not been completed. Better information is still needed to fully understand the status of the physician-scientist workforce, and to assess efforts to stabilize this vulnerable career path.",
keywords = "physician-scientist, research, training, workforce",
author = "Garrison, {Howard H.} and Ley, {Timothy J.}",
note = "Funding Information: For decades, beginning with Wyngaarden's seminal study, the number of NIH research grants to individuals with MD degrees has been used to assess the physician‐scientist workforce. While NIH grants are not the only source of support for physician‐scientists, NIH is the largest single funder of biomedical research in the U.S. For decades, receipt of a first R01‐Equivalent grant has been used to measure the number of new physician‐scientists entering the research workforce. R01 (or equivalent) grants, the major mechanism used by the NIH to fund multi‐year investigations, confer recognition that the recipient has identified a significant research problem and proposed a viable mechanism to address it. Unfortunately, the NIH is no longer posting data on research grant applications and awards by degree and sex. At one point, in response to a recommendation of the Physician‐Scientist Workforce Working Group, NIH created an online dashboard with this information, but it is no longer active. 6 61 2,4,10 62 Funding Information: Medical specialty groups have also established programs to encourage the career development of physician‐scientists. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine created the Clinical Research/Reproductive Scientist Training Program with support from the National Institute for Child Health and Human Development. The Society of University Surgeons developed recommendations on how to choose an initial job and identify a team of committed mentors. Several of these initiatives have demonstrated positive outcomes. An evaluation of the Norman S. Coplon Extramural Grant program for early career physician‐scientists in nephrology reported impressive results, with more than 90% of program alumni staying in academia. A training program to prepare physician‐scientists for independent careers in child psychiatry found that former trainees outperformed a control group on several outcome measures, including NIH R series grants. All but one of the 34 Pediatric Critical Care Trauma Scientist Development Fellows remained active in research, and 60% had been promoted to associate or full professor. GME research participation for surgery fellows was associated with faculty appointments and NIH grants. Incorporation of graduate degree programs into specialty or subspecialty training has been used to help clinically trained individuals develop research skills. 31 32 33 34 35 36 16,18,37 Funding Information: The NIH workforce study and others proposed increases in the number of career development awards providing “protected time,” like NIH K Grants, so that early career physician‐scientists could launch successful research programs. Evidence suggests that mentored K Awardees were far more likely to receive R01 Awards than medical school graduates without them. Comparing a matched sample of K Awardees and unsuccessful K Applicants, Nikaj and Lund found that a mentored K Award was associated with a 24.1% increase in the likelihood of a subsequent, independent NIH award. A study of obstetrics and gynecology physician‐scientists also reported that receipt of an NIH K Award led to higher levels of subsequent NIH grant funding. Among pediatric surgeons, 63% of those with K Awards were successful in obtaining subsequent R01 Grants. Analyses of similar early career development programs, including the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Clinical Scientist Development Award, found that program alumni were more likely than non‐alumni to have received subsequent NIH R01 Grants. 4 21,22 25 26 27 28 29 Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors. The FASEB Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.",
year = "2022",
month = may,
doi = "10.1096/fj.202200327",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
journal = "FASEB Journal",
issn = "0892-6638",
number = "5",
}