Phenotypic and genetic analyses of a short measure of psychosis-proneness in a large-scale Australian twin study

David A. Hay, Nicholas G. Martin, Debra Foley, Susan A. Treloar, Katherine M. Kirk, Andrew C. Heath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Previous genetic analyses of psychosis proneness have been limited by their small sample size. For the purposes of large-scale screening, a 12-item questionnaire was developed through a two-stage process of reduction from the full Chapman and Chapman scales. 3685 individuals (including 1438 complete twin pairs) aged 18-25 years and enrolled in the volunteer Australian Twin Registry returned a mail questionnaire which included this psychosis proneness scale and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Despite the brevity of the questionnaire, item and factor analysis identified four unambiguous and essentially uncorrelated scales. There were (1) Perceptual Aberration - Magical Ideation; (2) Hypomania -Impulsivity/Nonconformity; (3) Social Anhedonia and (4) Physical Anhedonia. Model-fitting analyses showed additive genetic and specific environmental factors were sufficient for three of the four scales, with the Social Anhedonia scale requiring also a parameter for genetic dominance. There was no evidence for the previously hypothesised sex differences in the genetic determination of psychosis-proneness. The potential value of multivariate genetic analysis to examine the relationship between these four scales and dimensions of personality is discussed. The growing body of longitudinal evidence on psychosis-proneness suggests the value of incorporating this brief measure into developmental twin studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-40
Number of pages11
JournalTwin Research
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2001

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Phenotypic and genetic analyses of a short measure of psychosis-proneness in a large-scale Australian twin study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this