Phase I study of biweekly oxaliplatin, gemcitabine and capecitabine in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal malignancies

B. R. Tan, W. S. Brenner, J. Picus, S. Marsh, F. Gao, C. Fournier, P. M. Fracasso, J. James, J. L. Yen-Revollo, H. L. McLeod

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Oxaliplatin, gemcitabine and capecitabine are all active agents against upper gastrointestinal and pancreaticobiliary cancers. Patients and methods: Patients with upper gastrointestinal malignancies treated with 0-2 prior chemotherapy regimens received oxaliplatin (85-100 mg/m2) as a 2-h i.v. infusion with gemcitabine (800-1000 mg/m2) at a constant rate i.v. infusion (CI) of 10 mg/m2/min on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Capecitabine (600-800 mg/m2) was administered orally twice a day on days 1-7 and 15-21. A three per cohort dose escalation schema was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxic effects (DLTs) of this combination regimen. Results: Thirty patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal malignancies were enrolled. The MTD was defined as oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 i.v. over 2 h plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 i.v. at a CI of 10 mg/m2/min on days 1 and 15 with capecitabine 800 mg/m2 p.o. b.i.d. days 1-7 and 15-21 of a 29-day cycle. DLTs include grade 3 fatigue and grade 3 dyspnea. One complete and two partial responses were observed. Conclusions: This biweekly schedule of oxaliplatin, gemcitabine and capecitabine is tolerable and warrants further investigation in biliary and pancreatic malignancies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1742-1748
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Oncology
Volume19
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Keywords

  • Capecitabine
  • Gemcitabine
  • Oxaliplatin
  • Upper gastrointestinal malignancies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phase I study of biweekly oxaliplatin, gemcitabine and capecitabine in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal malignancies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this