Pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep-vein thrombosis

Suresh Vedantham, Samuel Z. Goldhaber, Jim A. Julian, Susan R. Kahn, Michael R. Jaff, David J. Cohen, Elizabeth Magnuson, Mahmood K. Razavi, Anthony J. Comerota, Heather L. Gornik, Timothy P. Murphy, Lawrence Lewis, James R. Duncan, Patricia Nieters, Mary C. Derfler, Marc Filion, Chu Shu Gu, Stephen Kee, Joseph Schneider, Nael SaadMorey Blinder, Stephan Moll, David Sacks, Judith Lin, John Rundback, Mark Garcia, Rahul Razdan, Eric VanderWoude, Vasco Marques, Clive Kearon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

536 Scopus citations


BACKGROUND The post-thrombotic syndrome frequently develops in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis despite treatment with anticoagulant therapy. Pharmacomechanical catheterdirected thrombolysis (hereafter "pharmacomechanical thrombolysis") rapidly removes thrombus and is hypothesized to reduce the risk of the post-thrombotic syndrome. METHODS We randomly assigned 692 patients with acute proximal deep-vein thrombosis to receive either anticoagulation alone (control group) or anticoagulation plus pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (catheter-mediated or device-mediated intrathrombus delivery of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and thrombus aspiration or maceration, with or without stenting). The primary outcome was development of the post-thrombotic syndrome between 6 and 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS Between 6 and 24 months, there was no significant between-group difference in the percentage of patients with the post-thrombotic syndrome (47% in the pharmacomechanical- thrombolysis group and 48% in the control group; risk ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.11; P = 0.56). Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis led to more major bleeding events within 10 days (1.7% vs. 0.3% of patients, P = 0.049), but no significant difference in recurrent venous thromboembolism was seen over the 24-month follow-up period (12% in the pharmacomechanical-thrombolysis group and 8% in the control group, P = 0.09). Moderate-to-severe post-thrombotic syndrome occurred in 18% of patients in the pharmacomechanical-thrombolysis group versus 24% of those in the control group (risk ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.98; P = 0.04). Severity scores for the post-thrombotic syndrome were lower in the pharmacomechanicalthrombolysis group than in the control group at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of follow-up (P<0.01 for the comparison of the Villalta scores at each time point), but the improvement in quality of life from baseline to 24 months did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with acute proximal deep-vein thrombosis, the addition of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis to anticoagulation did not result in a lower risk of the post-thrombotic syndrome but did result in a higher risk of major bleeding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2240-2252
Number of pages13
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Issue number23
StatePublished - Dec 7 2017


Dive into the research topics of 'Pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep-vein thrombosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this