TY - JOUR
T1 - PET-measured heterogeneity in longitudinal myocardial blood flow in response to sympathetic and pharmacologic stress as a non-invasive probe of epicardial vasomotor dysfunction
AU - Schindler, Thomas H.
AU - Facta, Alvaro D.
AU - Prior, John O.
AU - Campisi, Roxana
AU - Inubushi, Masayuki
AU - Kreissl, Michael C.
AU - Zhang, Xiao Li
AU - Sayre, James
AU - Dahlbom, Magnus
AU - Schelbert, Heinrich R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements. The authors wish to thank the PET Imaging and Cyclotron staff for their support in the imaging studies, Akiyaa Nickelson for preparing the illustrations, and Victoria Bender for her secretarial assistance. This work was supported by a Research Grant HL 33177, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD.
PY - 2006/10
Y1 - 2006/10
N2 - Purpose: We investigated whether a myocardial perfusion gradient during pharmacologically induced hyperemia also occurred during sympathetic stimulation with cold pressor testing (CPT), which commonly induces a paradoxical coronary vasoconstriction in individuals with coronary risk factors. Methods: Myocardial blood flow (MBF) was measured in absolute units (ml/g/min) with 13N-ammonia and PET at rest, during CPT, and during pharmacologic vasodilation in 59 participants with coronary risk factors ("at risk") and in 43 healthy individuals (controls). MBF was assessed globally as mean MBF, and in the mid and mid-distal myocardium of the left ventricle (LV). A decrease in MBF from mid to mid-distal LV myocardium was defined as MBF difference indicative of a perfusion gradient. Results: The change in mean MBF to CPT (ΔMBF) in the at-risk group was significantly reduced compared with controls (0.05±0.19 vs 0.31±0.20 ml/g/min, p<0.0001), whereas mean MBF during pharmacologic vasodilation in the at-risk group tended to be lower than in controls (1.72±0.71 vs 2.00±0.64 ml/g/min, p=NS). Absolute MBFs during CPT and pharmacologic vasodilation were significantly lower in the mid-distal than in the mid LV myocardium, resulting in a significant MBF difference in the at-risk group (0.15±0.06 and 0.27±0.12 ml/g/min, p<0.0001) that was not observed in controls (0.007±0.05 and 0.014±0.10 ml/g/min, p=NS). In the at-risk group there was a significant correlation between the difference of mid to mid-distal MBF during CPT and that during pharmacologic vasodilation (r=0.43, p<0.004), suggesting functional alterations of epicardial vessels as the predominant cause for the observed MBF difference. Conclusion: The relative decrease in MBF from the mid to the mid-distal left-ventricular myocardium suggests an intracoronary pressure decline during CPT and pharmacologic vasodilation, which is likely to reflect an impairment of flow-mediated epicardial vasomotor function.
AB - Purpose: We investigated whether a myocardial perfusion gradient during pharmacologically induced hyperemia also occurred during sympathetic stimulation with cold pressor testing (CPT), which commonly induces a paradoxical coronary vasoconstriction in individuals with coronary risk factors. Methods: Myocardial blood flow (MBF) was measured in absolute units (ml/g/min) with 13N-ammonia and PET at rest, during CPT, and during pharmacologic vasodilation in 59 participants with coronary risk factors ("at risk") and in 43 healthy individuals (controls). MBF was assessed globally as mean MBF, and in the mid and mid-distal myocardium of the left ventricle (LV). A decrease in MBF from mid to mid-distal LV myocardium was defined as MBF difference indicative of a perfusion gradient. Results: The change in mean MBF to CPT (ΔMBF) in the at-risk group was significantly reduced compared with controls (0.05±0.19 vs 0.31±0.20 ml/g/min, p<0.0001), whereas mean MBF during pharmacologic vasodilation in the at-risk group tended to be lower than in controls (1.72±0.71 vs 2.00±0.64 ml/g/min, p=NS). Absolute MBFs during CPT and pharmacologic vasodilation were significantly lower in the mid-distal than in the mid LV myocardium, resulting in a significant MBF difference in the at-risk group (0.15±0.06 and 0.27±0.12 ml/g/min, p<0.0001) that was not observed in controls (0.007±0.05 and 0.014±0.10 ml/g/min, p=NS). In the at-risk group there was a significant correlation between the difference of mid to mid-distal MBF during CPT and that during pharmacologic vasodilation (r=0.43, p<0.004), suggesting functional alterations of epicardial vessels as the predominant cause for the observed MBF difference. Conclusion: The relative decrease in MBF from the mid to the mid-distal left-ventricular myocardium suggests an intracoronary pressure decline during CPT and pharmacologic vasodilation, which is likely to reflect an impairment of flow-mediated epicardial vasomotor function.
KW - Blood flow
KW - Circulation
KW - Endothelium
KW - Risk factors
KW - Tomography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749260741&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00259-006-0069-7
DO - 10.1007/s00259-006-0069-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 16639609
AN - SCOPUS:33749260741
SN - 1619-7070
VL - 33
SP - 1140
EP - 1149
JO - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
JF - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
IS - 10
ER -