TY - JOUR
T1 - Perinatal mortality, timing of delivery and prenatal management of monoamniotic twin pregnancy
T2 - systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - D'Antonio, F.
AU - Odibo, A.
AU - Berghella, V.
AU - Khalil, A.
AU - Hack, K.
AU - Saccone, G.
AU - Prefumo, F.
AU - Buca, D.
AU - Liberati, M.
AU - Pagani, G.
AU - Acharya, G.
N1 - Funding Information:
1Women’s Health and Perinatology Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT – The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway; 3 Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA; 4Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 5Fetal Medicine Unit, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of London, London, UK; 6Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK; 7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands; 8Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; 9Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; 10Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy; 11Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy; 12Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; 13Center for Fetal Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2019/2/1
Y1 - 2019/2/1
N2 - Objective: To quantify the rate of perinatal mortality in monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) twin pregnancies, according to gestational age, and to ascertain the incidence of mortality in pregnancies managed as inpatients compared with those managed as outpatients. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases were searched for studies on monoamniotic twin pregnancy. The primary outcomes explored were the incidence of intrauterine death (IUD), neonatal death (NND) and perinatal death (PND) in MCMA twins at different gestational-age windows (24–30, 31–32, 33–34, 35–36 and ≥ 37 weeks of gestation). The secondary outcomes were the incidence of IUD, NND and PND in MCMA twins according to the type of fetal monitoring (inpatient vs outpatient), and the incidence of delivery ahead of schedule. Random-effects model meta-analyses were used to analyze the data. Results: Twenty-five studies (1628 non-anomalous twins reaching 24 weeks of gestation) were included. Single and double intrauterine deaths occurred in 2.5% (95% CI, 1.8–3.3%) and 3.8% (95% CI, 2.5–5.3%) of cases, respectively. IUD occurred in 4.3% (95% CI, 2.8–6.2%) of twins at 24–30 weeks, in 1.0% (95% CI, 0.6–1.7%) at 31–32 weeks and in 2.2% (95% CI, 0.9–3.9%) at 33–34 weeks of gestation, while there was no case of IUD, either single or double, from 35 weeks of gestation. In MCMA twin pregnancies managed mainly as inpatients, the incidence of IUD was 3.0% (95% CI, 1.4–5.2%), while the corresponding figure for those managed mainly as outpatients was 7.4% (95% CI, 4.4–11.1%). Finally, 37.8% (95% CI, 28.0–48.2%) of MCMA pregnancies were delivered before the scheduled time, due mainly to spontaneous preterm labor or abnormal cardiotocographic findings. Conclusions: MCMA twins are at high risk of perinatal loss during the third trimester of pregnancy, with the large majority of such losses occurring as apparently unexpected events. Inpatient management seems to be associated with a lower rate of mortality, although further studies are needed in order to establish the appropriate type and timing of prenatal assessment in these pregnancies.
AB - Objective: To quantify the rate of perinatal mortality in monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) twin pregnancies, according to gestational age, and to ascertain the incidence of mortality in pregnancies managed as inpatients compared with those managed as outpatients. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases were searched for studies on monoamniotic twin pregnancy. The primary outcomes explored were the incidence of intrauterine death (IUD), neonatal death (NND) and perinatal death (PND) in MCMA twins at different gestational-age windows (24–30, 31–32, 33–34, 35–36 and ≥ 37 weeks of gestation). The secondary outcomes were the incidence of IUD, NND and PND in MCMA twins according to the type of fetal monitoring (inpatient vs outpatient), and the incidence of delivery ahead of schedule. Random-effects model meta-analyses were used to analyze the data. Results: Twenty-five studies (1628 non-anomalous twins reaching 24 weeks of gestation) were included. Single and double intrauterine deaths occurred in 2.5% (95% CI, 1.8–3.3%) and 3.8% (95% CI, 2.5–5.3%) of cases, respectively. IUD occurred in 4.3% (95% CI, 2.8–6.2%) of twins at 24–30 weeks, in 1.0% (95% CI, 0.6–1.7%) at 31–32 weeks and in 2.2% (95% CI, 0.9–3.9%) at 33–34 weeks of gestation, while there was no case of IUD, either single or double, from 35 weeks of gestation. In MCMA twin pregnancies managed mainly as inpatients, the incidence of IUD was 3.0% (95% CI, 1.4–5.2%), while the corresponding figure for those managed mainly as outpatients was 7.4% (95% CI, 4.4–11.1%). Finally, 37.8% (95% CI, 28.0–48.2%) of MCMA pregnancies were delivered before the scheduled time, due mainly to spontaneous preterm labor or abnormal cardiotocographic findings. Conclusions: MCMA twins are at high risk of perinatal loss during the third trimester of pregnancy, with the large majority of such losses occurring as apparently unexpected events. Inpatient management seems to be associated with a lower rate of mortality, although further studies are needed in order to establish the appropriate type and timing of prenatal assessment in these pregnancies.
KW - monoamniotic twin pregnancy
KW - neonatal outcome
KW - systematic review
KW - timing of delivery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061100430&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/uog.20100
DO - 10.1002/uog.20100
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30125418
AN - SCOPUS:85061100430
SN - 0960-7692
VL - 53
SP - 166
EP - 174
JO - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
IS - 2
ER -