Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Performance of two forms of a computer psychiatric screening interview: Version I of the DISSI

  • Kathleen K. Bucholz
  • , Lee N. Robins
  • , Joseph J. Shayka
  • , Thomas R. Przybeck
  • , John E. Helzer
  • , Evelyn Goldring
  • , Marjorie H. Klein
  • , John H. Greist
  • , Harold P. Erdman
  • , Stacey S. Skare

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study reports on the performance of two forms of version I of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) computer screening interview, using the traditional interviewer-administered DIS (T-DIS) as the standard. The screening interview was either self-administered (called the S-DISSI) with the subject keying in responses, or interviewer-administered (I-DISSI), with the interviewer keying in the subject's responses. Sensitivity and specificity for both forms were ample (excluding antisocial personality), ranging from 60% to 100% for sensitivity and 54% to 95% for specificity. Concordances with the T-DIS were similar for both forms of the screening interview, ranging from .10 to .87 and compared favorably to those reported by other investigators. The I-DISSI took on average 30 min less than either the T-DIS and S-DISSI. Since the performances of both versions were equivalent, the decision to use either may be based on available resources and characteristics of the study population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-129
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Psychiatric Research
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance of two forms of a computer psychiatric screening interview: Version I of the DISSI'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this