TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of two forms of a computer psychiatric screening interview
T2 - Version I of the DISSI
AU - Bucholz, Kathleen K.
AU - Robins, Lee N.
AU - Shayka, Joseph J.
AU - Przybeck, Thomas R.
AU - Helzer, John E.
AU - Goldring, Evelyn
AU - Klein, Marjorie H.
AU - Greist, John H.
AU - Erdman, Harold P.
AU - Skare, Stacey S.
PY - 1991
Y1 - 1991
N2 - This study reports on the performance of two forms of version I of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) computer screening interview, using the traditional interviewer-administered DIS (T-DIS) as the standard. The screening interview was either self-administered (called the S-DISSI) with the subject keying in responses, or interviewer-administered (I-DISSI), with the interviewer keying in the subject's responses. Sensitivity and specificity for both forms were ample (excluding antisocial personality), ranging from 60% to 100% for sensitivity and 54% to 95% for specificity. Concordances with the T-DIS were similar for both forms of the screening interview, ranging from .10 to .87 and compared favorably to those reported by other investigators. The I-DISSI took on average 30 min less than either the T-DIS and S-DISSI. Since the performances of both versions were equivalent, the decision to use either may be based on available resources and characteristics of the study population.
AB - This study reports on the performance of two forms of version I of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) computer screening interview, using the traditional interviewer-administered DIS (T-DIS) as the standard. The screening interview was either self-administered (called the S-DISSI) with the subject keying in responses, or interviewer-administered (I-DISSI), with the interviewer keying in the subject's responses. Sensitivity and specificity for both forms were ample (excluding antisocial personality), ranging from 60% to 100% for sensitivity and 54% to 95% for specificity. Concordances with the T-DIS were similar for both forms of the screening interview, ranging from .10 to .87 and compared favorably to those reported by other investigators. The I-DISSI took on average 30 min less than either the T-DIS and S-DISSI. Since the performances of both versions were equivalent, the decision to use either may be based on available resources and characteristics of the study population.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025781581&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0022-3956(91)90005-U
DO - 10.1016/0022-3956(91)90005-U
M3 - Article
C2 - 1941708
AN - SCOPUS:0025781581
SN - 0022-3956
VL - 25
SP - 117
EP - 129
JO - Journal of Psychiatric Research
JF - Journal of Psychiatric Research
IS - 3
ER -