TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of Medication Tasks
T2 - Relationship Among Patient-Reported Outcomes, Performance-Based Assessments, and Objective Assessments
AU - Schwartz, Jaclyn
AU - Aylmer, Katherine
AU - Green, Samara
AU - Tayeb, Sami
AU - Wolf, Timothy J.
AU - Unni, Elizabeth
AU - Somerville, Emily
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/5
Y1 - 2024/5
N2 - Importance: Occupational therapy practitioners use standardized assessments to guide their clinical decision-making, but it is unclear how well performance on standardized assessments translates to performance at home. Objective: To understand the concurrent and predictive validity of patient-reported outcomes and performance-based assessments for monitoring performance at home within the context of medication management and adherence. Design: Exploratory study. Setting: Participants completed standardized assessments in a lab or at home, which were followed by home-based electronic monitoring of medication adherence. Participants: Sixty community-dwelling adults with hypertension or stroke who independently took antihypertensive medications. Outcomes and Measures: Participants completed the Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Scale, the Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Reasons Scale, the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills Medication Management subtask, and the Executive Function Performance Test–Enhanced Medication Management subtest. Then, they used an electronic pill cap to monitor medication adherence at home for 1 month. Results: Patient-reported outcomes and performance-based assessments in the context of medication management and adherence demonstrated poor concurrent and predictive validity to medication adherence at home. Conclusions and Relevance: There is a gap between what people think they will do, what they can do on a standardized assessment, and what they actually do at home. Future research is needed to strengthen concurrent and predictive validity to clinically meaningful outcomes. Plain-Language Summary: Occupational therapy practitioners should use caution when using standardized assessments to try to predict client performance at home. They should also continue to use a battery of assessments, clinical reasoning, and client preferences to guide their decision-making for monitoring performance at home within the context of medication management and adherence.
AB - Importance: Occupational therapy practitioners use standardized assessments to guide their clinical decision-making, but it is unclear how well performance on standardized assessments translates to performance at home. Objective: To understand the concurrent and predictive validity of patient-reported outcomes and performance-based assessments for monitoring performance at home within the context of medication management and adherence. Design: Exploratory study. Setting: Participants completed standardized assessments in a lab or at home, which were followed by home-based electronic monitoring of medication adherence. Participants: Sixty community-dwelling adults with hypertension or stroke who independently took antihypertensive medications. Outcomes and Measures: Participants completed the Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Scale, the Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Reasons Scale, the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills Medication Management subtask, and the Executive Function Performance Test–Enhanced Medication Management subtest. Then, they used an electronic pill cap to monitor medication adherence at home for 1 month. Results: Patient-reported outcomes and performance-based assessments in the context of medication management and adherence demonstrated poor concurrent and predictive validity to medication adherence at home. Conclusions and Relevance: There is a gap between what people think they will do, what they can do on a standardized assessment, and what they actually do at home. Future research is needed to strengthen concurrent and predictive validity to clinically meaningful outcomes. Plain-Language Summary: Occupational therapy practitioners should use caution when using standardized assessments to try to predict client performance at home. They should also continue to use a battery of assessments, clinical reasoning, and client preferences to guide their decision-making for monitoring performance at home within the context of medication management and adherence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193587265&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5014/ajot.2024.050500
DO - 10.5014/ajot.2024.050500
M3 - Article
C2 - 38758764
AN - SCOPUS:85193587265
SN - 0272-9490
VL - 78
JO - American Journal of Occupational Therapy
JF - American Journal of Occupational Therapy
IS - 3
M1 - 7803205060
ER -