Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Perceiving objects the brain does not represent

  • Michael Barkasi
  • , James Openshaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It is often assumed that neural representation, with content that is in principle detachable from the flow of natural-factive information, is necessary to perceptually experience an object. In this paper we present and discuss two cases challenging this assumption. We take them to show that it is possible to experience an object with which you are interacting through your sensory systems without those systems constructing a representation of the object. The first example is viewing nearby medium-sized groups of objects. The second is hearing objects through misbound sounds. These cases bring out two different ways object representation can fail while object experience persists, suggesting that object experience requires only that the object be revealed through sensory information, not full-blown representation. Constructing object representations is one way sensory systems reveal objects, but it is not the only way. Object representation in neural sensory systems is relatively demanding, rare, and fragile; object experience is relatively easy, pervasive, and robust. We conclude that even minimal forms of neural phenomenal internalism are false.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPhenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

Keywords

  • Ensemble perception
  • Multimodal binding
  • Object representation
  • Perceptual experience
  • Phenomenal internalism
  • Representationalism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perceiving objects the brain does not represent'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this