TY - JOUR
T1 - Pedicle Lengthening Osteotomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
T2 - A Systematic Review of Cadaveric, Computational, and Clinical Outcomes
AU - Ledesma, Jonathan A.
AU - Castillo Tafur, Julio
AU - Anderson, Bradley
AU - Rangavajjula, Lasya
AU - Lambrechts, Mark J.
AU - Anderson, D. Greg
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - Study Design: Systematic Review. Objective: To review the available published literature relating to pedicle lengthening osteotomy (PLO) for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), and to compare this technique to existing surgical options. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were reviewed using the keywords: “pedicle lengthening”, “lumbar”, and “spinal stenosis.” Results were reviewed for relevance and included only if they met inclusion criteria. The SYRCLE checklist was used to assess for sources of bias. Results: Inclusion criteria were biomechanical or clinical studies evaluating PLO for LSS. A total of 56 studies were identified in the Pubmed/MEDLINE database using the above-mentioned search criteria. Additionally, a total of 83 abstracts were reviewed in Embase, and 76 abstracts were reviewed in Scopus. After screening, 7 articles met inclusion criteria. Conclusions: PLO is a percutaneous, minimally invasive technique that has been described for the treatment of LSS. Biomechanical studies demonstrate significant enlargements in spinal canal dimensions and improvements in patient reported outcome measures while maintaining kinematic properties similar to the intact spine. Although overall sample size remains small, available data regarding PLO performed for LSS have shown encouraging early results.
AB - Study Design: Systematic Review. Objective: To review the available published literature relating to pedicle lengthening osteotomy (PLO) for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), and to compare this technique to existing surgical options. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were reviewed using the keywords: “pedicle lengthening”, “lumbar”, and “spinal stenosis.” Results were reviewed for relevance and included only if they met inclusion criteria. The SYRCLE checklist was used to assess for sources of bias. Results: Inclusion criteria were biomechanical or clinical studies evaluating PLO for LSS. A total of 56 studies were identified in the Pubmed/MEDLINE database using the above-mentioned search criteria. Additionally, a total of 83 abstracts were reviewed in Embase, and 76 abstracts were reviewed in Scopus. After screening, 7 articles met inclusion criteria. Conclusions: PLO is a percutaneous, minimally invasive technique that has been described for the treatment of LSS. Biomechanical studies demonstrate significant enlargements in spinal canal dimensions and improvements in patient reported outcome measures while maintaining kinematic properties similar to the intact spine. Although overall sample size remains small, available data regarding PLO performed for LSS have shown encouraging early results.
KW - Lumbar spinal stenosis
KW - decompression
KW - minimally invasive
KW - pedicle lengthening
KW - spondylolisthesis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105004171383
U2 - 10.1177/21925682251338837
DO - 10.1177/21925682251338837
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40305551
AN - SCOPUS:105004171383
SN - 2192-5682
VL - 15
SP - 3495
EP - 3505
JO - Global Spine Journal
JF - Global Spine Journal
IS - 7
ER -