Pedicle Lengthening Osteotomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of Cadaveric, Computational, and Clinical Outcomes

  • Jonathan A. Ledesma
  • , Julio Castillo Tafur
  • , Bradley Anderson
  • , Lasya Rangavajjula
  • , Mark J. Lambrechts
  • , D. Greg Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Study Design: Systematic Review. Objective: To review the available published literature relating to pedicle lengthening osteotomy (PLO) for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), and to compare this technique to existing surgical options. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were reviewed using the keywords: “pedicle lengthening”, “lumbar”, and “spinal stenosis.” Results were reviewed for relevance and included only if they met inclusion criteria. The SYRCLE checklist was used to assess for sources of bias. Results: Inclusion criteria were biomechanical or clinical studies evaluating PLO for LSS. A total of 56 studies were identified in the Pubmed/MEDLINE database using the above-mentioned search criteria. Additionally, a total of 83 abstracts were reviewed in Embase, and 76 abstracts were reviewed in Scopus. After screening, 7 articles met inclusion criteria. Conclusions: PLO is a percutaneous, minimally invasive technique that has been described for the treatment of LSS. Biomechanical studies demonstrate significant enlargements in spinal canal dimensions and improvements in patient reported outcome measures while maintaining kinematic properties similar to the intact spine. Although overall sample size remains small, available data regarding PLO performed for LSS have shown encouraging early results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3495-3505
Number of pages11
JournalGlobal Spine Journal
Volume15
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2025

Keywords

  • Lumbar spinal stenosis
  • decompression
  • minimally invasive
  • pedicle lengthening
  • spondylolisthesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pedicle Lengthening Osteotomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of Cadaveric, Computational, and Clinical Outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this