Pediatric ovarian tumors - Dilemmas in diagnosis and management

E. M. Ruttenstock, A. K. Saxena, W. Schwinger, E. Sorantin, M. E. Hoellwarth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Ovarian tumors are rare in the pediatric age group and thus diagnostic and treatment strategies are heterogeneous. This study aims to evaluate ovarian tumors with a focus on age at presentation, imaging characteristics, diagnostic strategy, tumor presentation and management. Methods: Data was collected retrospectively from patients admitted between 1991 and 2008 for the evaluation and therapy of ovarian tumors. Results: Twenty-five patients were identified with neoplastic ovarian lesions (mean age 10.7 years). Sixteen patients (64%) underwent surgery for benign and 9 (36%) for malignant tumors. Benign tumors (n=16) had a mean diameter of 10.7cm and mean age at presentation was 9.6 years compared to a diameter of 18.6cm and 12.3 years in the malignant group (n=9). Elevated tumor markers were observed in 3 (12.5%) benign tumors and in 7 (77.8%) malignant tumors. In preoperative ultrasound investigation, cyst formation was identified in 4 benign tumors and solid tumor mass in 2 malignant tumors. A minimally invasive surgical approach was chosen in two patients, while open surgery was opted for in the rest. Conclusion: Cyst formation, small tumor size and younger age at presentation were characteristic of benign tumors. Malignant tumors often presented with elevated tumor markers, a larger size and a solid consistency. Diagnostic dilemmas remain for both tumor groups due to the different tumor types and the heterogeneity of presentation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)116-120
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Keywords

  • benign
  • malignant
  • ovarian tumors
  • pediatric

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pediatric ovarian tumors - Dilemmas in diagnosis and management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this